Bayesian outcome selection modelling

Khue‐Dung Dang,Louise M. Ryan,Richard J. Cook,Sandra W. Jacobson,Joseph L. Jacobson,Tugba Akkaya‐Hocagil
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sta4.568
2023-03-30
Stat
Abstract:In psychiatric and social epidemiology studies, it is common to measure multiple different outcomes using a comprehensive battery of tests thought to be related to an underlying construct of interest. In the research that motivates our work, researchers wanted to assess the impact of extit{in utero} alcohol exposure on child cognition and neuropsychological development, which are evaluated using a range of different psychometric tests. Statistical analysis of the resulting multiple outcomes data can be challenging, because the outcomes measured on the same individual are not independent. Moreover, it is unclear, a priori, which outcomes are impacted by the exposure under study. While researchers will typically have some hypotheses about which outcomes are important, a framework is needed to help identify outcomes that are sensitive to the exposure and to quantify the associated treatment or exposure effects of interest. We propose such a framework using a modification of stochastic search variable selection, a popular Bayesian variable selection model and use it to quantify an overall effect of the exposure on the affected outcomes. The performance of the method is investigated empirically and an illustration is given through application using data from our motivating study.
statistics & probability
What problem does this paper attempt to address?