Abstract:As an environmentally friendly and convenient transport mode, bike-sharing has been fast developed in major cities around the world. More bike-sharing firms have been formed and intensified market competition. The government has stipulated regulations to intervene in bike-sharing firm operations and to maintain orderly competition. This paper establishes an integrated economic model to examine duopoly bike-sharing firm competition in both prices and the number of deployed bikes. Specifically, more deployed bikes in the urban area reduce the time cost for the users to find an available bike (i.e., the search cost), but they can also impose a negative social externality on the urban management. Two government policies to control the number of deployed bikes have been examined and benchmarked. One is the limit on the total number of the deployed bikes (i.e., the supply-side regulation), and the other is the restriction to allow the users to only register or use certain firms' services (i.e., the demand-side regulation of single-homing). Our model is also further calibrated by using the bike-sharing market data of Beijing for policy implications. It is found that, when the negative social externality of bike deployment is sufficiently small, the government should allow users' multi-homing (i.e., registration on both firms' platforms). However, when the negative social externality is high, the government should strictly control the number of bikes through both the supply-side and demand-side restrictions. Our analyses also suggest that it is never socially optimal to only adopt the demand-side restriction (i.e., forcing the single-homing). That is, the supply-side policy is more socially preferred to correct the negative social externality in most cases. When two bike-sharing firms offer quite heterogeneous services (i.e., low service substitutability), it is more socially optimal to only implement the supply-side policy.

Entry and competition in the European bike-sharing industry

Market Expanding or Market Stealing? Platform Competition in Bike-Sharing

Bike-sharing duopoly competition under government regulation

New Generation of Bike-Sharing Systems in China: Lessons for European Cities

Electric Bicycle-Sharing: A New Competitor in the Urban Transportation Market? An Empirical Analysis of Transaction Data

Profit Versus Sustainability in Bikeshare

Competition, Integration, or Complementation? Exploring Dock-Based Bike-Sharing in New York City

Last-mile Commute: Impact of Bike-sharing on Restaurants

E-scooters: competition with shared bicycles and relationship to public transport

The effects of entry deregulation: evidence from interurban passenger transport

An origin-destination level analysis on the competitiveness of bike-sharing to underground using explainable machine learning

A Network Theory Approach to the Sharing Economy

Bike Share: A Synthesis of the Literature

The Effects of the Entries by Bike-Sharing Platforms on Urban Air Quality

The Shared Transportation Industry in China: Examining the Influence of Regional Environmental Factors on New Venture Formation

A Systematic Review of the Coopetition Relationship between Bike-Sharing and Public Transit

Is access to public bike-share networks equitable? A multiyear spatial analysis across 5 U.S. Cities

What is shared in shared bicycles? Mobility, space, and capital

Concentration and Competition: Evidence From Europe and Implications For Policy

Analysis of Temporal and Spatial Characteristics of Public Bicycle System Based on Shared Bicycle Trajectory Data

Emergence of scaling in dockless bike-sharing systems