Abstract:Background with rationaleData integration is undertaken for the public good, yet institutions rarely address structural bias in their history, or the ways data are biased due to systemic inequities in the administration of policies and programs. Meanwhile, the public are rarely consulted in data use. Though data infrastructure can be a powerful tool to support equity-oriented reforms, equity is rarely a stated goal for data integration. This raises fundamental concerns, as integrated data increasingly provide the raw materials for evaluation, research, and risk modeling that inform policy, practice, and resource allocation. Actionable Intelligence for Social Policy (AISP) is an initiative of the University of Pennsylvania that focuses on the development, use, and innovation of integrated data systems (IDS). We convene a network of IDS across the United States while supporting developing sites, and as such are uniquely situated to convene experts to develop guidance for centering equity within integrated data infrastructure. Main AimThis project aims to generate guidance for agencies supporting data sharing infrastructure to ensure an emphasis on equity and public engagement for ethical use. Methods/ApproachA variety of data collection methods are being used, including expert panel convenings and interviews with sites piloting or exemplifying strategies for public engagement and equitable data access and use. An extensive literature review is also in progress and will inform a suite of forthcoming products, including a white paper, communications and training materials. ResultsThe results will provide strategies for centering equity across the spectrum of data integration activities, including inclusive governance, staffing considerations, decisions about data quality, and the ethical use of data models and algorithms. Initial findings indicate there are few exemplar sites that routinely center equity within data integration efforts, yet there are promising incremental steps that sites can take to ensure ethical use. ConclusionWhile centering equity within data integration is an emerging focus, initial findings indicate the importance of such efforts, particularly in acknowledging and mitigating the risks of unacknowledged bias across use of administrative data for research and evaluation purposes.

Do good: Strategies for leading an inclusive data science or statistics consulting team

Culture Change Requires Personal and Organizational Changes: Lessons from the Shared Equity Leadership Model

A guide to successful management of collaborative partnerships in quantitative research: An illustration of the science of team science

Building Inclusive Leadership: A Biosciences Approach

A Dynamical Systems Description of Privilege, Power and Leadership in Academia: identifying barriers and paths to inclusive communities of excellent scholarship

Unleashing Excellence through Inclusion: Navigating the Engagement-Performance Paradox

Motivation, inclusivity, and realism should drive data science education

Strategies for centering equity and public engagement in the ethical use of integrated administrative data

Near-peer mentoring in data science: Two experiences at Stanford University

Promoting gender diversity in STEM faculty through leadership development

What is it that you say you do here? Advocating for the critical role of data scientists in research infrastructure

Advancing More Inclusive Tech Careers: How People Develop Their Potential and Thrive

Developing partnerships for academic data science consulting and collaboration units

Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion—Utilizing Student Voices During Strategic Decision-Making Processes

Understanding Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Roles in Academic Neurology Departments

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Leadership

It Is Leadership, but (Maybe) Not as You Know It: Advocating for a Diversity Paradigm in Sports Leadership and Beyond

Catalyzing Equity in STEM Teams: Harnessing Generative AI for Inclusion and Diversity

A Behavioral Approach to Organizational Change: Reinforcing Those Responsible for Facilitating the Climate and Hence Promoting Diversity

Commitment to inclusion: The importance of collaboration in gender equity work

Building an Inclusive AAS - The Critical Role of Diversity and Inclusion Training for AAS Council and Astronomy Leadership