Clinical Impact of the Implementation Strategies Used to Apply the 2013 Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium or 2018 Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, Sleep Disruption Guideline Recommendations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Nicole E Hume,Isabelle Zerfas,Adrian Wong,Michele Klein-Fedyshin,Pamela L Smithburger,Mitchell S Buckley,John W Devlin,Sandra L Kane-Gill,Nicole E. Hume,Pamela L. Smithburger,Mitchell S. Buckley,John W. Devlin,Sandra L. Kane-Gill
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000006178
IF: 8.8
2024-03-15
Critical Care Medicine
Abstract:OBJECTIVES: To summarize the effectiveness of implementation strategies for ICU execution of recommendations from the 2013 Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium (PAD) or 2018 PAD, Immobility, Sleep Disruption (PADIS) guidelines. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from January 2012 to August 2023. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020175268). STUDY SELECTION: Articles were included if: 1) design was randomized or cohort, 2) adult population evaluated, 3) employed recommendations from greater than or equal to two PAD/PADIS domains, and 4) evaluated greater than or equal to 1 of the following outcome(s): short-term mortality, delirium occurrence, mechanical ventilation (MV) duration, or ICU length of stay (LOS). DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently reviewed articles for eligibility, number of PAD/PADIS domains, quality according to National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute assessment tools, implementation strategy use (including Assess, prevent, and manage pain; Both SAT and SBT; Choice of analgesia and sedation; Delirium: assess, prevent, and manage; Early mobility and exercise; Family engagement and empowerment [ABCDEF] bundle) by Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) category, and clinical outcomes. Certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. DATA SYNTHESIS: Among the 25 of 243 (10.3%) full-text articles included (n = 23,215 patients), risk of bias was high in 13 (52%). Most studies were cohort (n = 22, 88%). A median of 5 (interquartile range [IQR] 4–7) EPOC strategies were used to implement recommendations from two (IQR 2–3) PAD/PADIS domains. Cohort and randomized studies were pooled separately. In the cohort studies, use of EPOC strategies was not associated with a change in mortality (risk ratio [RR] 1.01; 95% CI, 0.9–1.12), or delirium (RR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.82–1.03), but was associated with a reduction in MV duration (weighted mean difference [WMD] –0.84 d; 95% CI, –1.25 to –0.43) and ICU LOS (WMD –0.77 d; 95% CI, –1.51 to 0.04). For randomized studies, EPOC strategy use was associated with reduced mortality and MV duration but not delirium or ICU LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Using multiple implementation strategies to adopt PAD/PADIS guideline recommendations may reduce mortality, duration of MV, and ICU LOS. Further prospective, controlled studies are needed to identify the most effective strategies to implement PAD/PADIS recommendations.
critical care medicine