Abstract:Abstract. Hydrological simulations are a main method of quantifying the contribution rate (CR) of climate change (CC) and human activities (HAs) to watershed streamflow changes. However, the uncertainty of hydrological simulations is rarely considered in current research. To fill this research gap, based on the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model, in this study, we propose a new framework to quantify the contribution rate of climate change and human activities based on the posterior histogram distribution of hydrological simulations. In our new quantitative framework, the uncertainty of hydrological simulations is first considered to avoid the phenomenon of "equifinality for different parameters", which is common in hydrological simulations. The Lancang River (LR) Basin in China, which has been greatly affected by human activities in the past two decades, is then selected as the study area. The global gridded monthly sectoral water use data set (GMSWU), coupled with the dead capacity data of the large reservoirs within the LR basin and the Budyko hypothesis framework, are used to compare the calculation result of the novel framework. The results show that (1) the annual streamflow at Yunjinghong station in the Lancang River Basin changed abruptly in 2005, which was mainly due to the construction of the Xiaowan hydropower station that started in October 2004. The annual streamflow and annual mean temperature time series from 1961 to 2015 in the LR Basin showed a significant decreasing and increasing trend at the α = 0.01 significance level, respectively. The annual precipitation showed an insignificant decreasing trend. (2) The results of quantitative analysis using the new framework showed that the reason for the decrease in the streamflow at Yunjinghong station was 42.6 % due to climate change, and the remaining 57.4 % was due to human activities, such as the construction of hydropower stations within the study area. (3) The comparison with the other two methods showed that the contribution rate of climate change calculated by the Budyko framework and the GMSWU data were 37.2 % and 42.5 %, respectively, and the errors of the calculations of the new framework proposed in this study were within 5 %. Therefore, the newly proposed framework, which considers the uncertainty of hydrological simulations, can accurately quantify the contribution rate of climate change and human activities to streamflow changes. (4) The quantitative results calculated by using the simulation results with the largest Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE) indicated that climate change was the dominant factor for streamflow reduction, which was in opposition to the calculation results of our new framework. In other words, our novel framework could effectively solve the calculation errors caused by the “equifinality for different parameters” of hydrological simulations. (5) The results of this case study also showed that the reduction in the streamflow in June and November was mainly caused by decreased precipitation and increased evapotranspiration, while the changes in the streamflow in other months were mainly due to human activities such as the regulation of the constructed reservoirs. In general, the novel quantitative framework that considers the uncertainty of hydrological simulations presented in this study has validated an efficient alternative for quantifying the contribution rate of climate change and human activities to streamflow changes.

Bayesian Framework for Uncertainty Quantification and Bias Correction of Projected Streamflow in Climate Change Impact Assessment

Investigating the Uncertainty and Transferability of Parameters in Swat Model under Climate Change

Modeling the Impact of Climate Change on Low Flows in Xiangjiang River Basin with Bayesian Averaging Method

Improved Simulation of Peak Flows under Climate Change: Postprocessing or Composite Objective Calibration?

Assessment of Extreme Flows and Uncertainty under Climate Change: Disentangling the Uncertainty Contribution of Representative Concentration Pathways, Global Climate Models and Internal Climate Variability

A Bayesian hierarchical framework for post-processing daily streamflow simulations across a river network

A Probabilistic Method for Streamflow Projection and Associated Uncertainty Analysis in a Data Sparse Alpine Region

Quantifying Predictive Uncertainty of Streamflow Forecasts Based on a Bayesian Joint Probability Model

Hydrological modeling and uncertainty analysis for a snow-covered mountainous river basin

Calibration and quantifying uncertainty of daily water quality forecasts for large lakes with a Bayesian joint probability modelling approach

Attribution of Climate Change and Human Activities to Streamflow Variations with a Posterior Distribution of Hydrological Simulations

An Ensemble-Based Dynamic Bayesian Averaging Approach for Discharge Simulations Using Multiple Global Precipitation Products and Hydrological Models.

Coupling SWAT and Bi-LSTM for improving daily-scale hydro-climatic simulation and climate change impact assessment in a tropical river basin

Bayesian characterization of uncertainties surrounding fluvial flood hazard estimates

A framework for parameter estimation, sensitivity analysis, and uncertainty analysis for holistic hydrologic modeling using SWAT+

Uncertainty quantization of meteorological input and model parameters for hydrological modelling using a Bayesian‐based integrated approach

Uncertainty Quantification in Inverse Models in Hydrology

Separation and Prioritization of Uncertainty Sources in a Raster Based Flood Inundation Model Using Hierarchical Bayesian Model Averaging

A non-stationary bias adjustment method for improving the inter-annual variability and persistence of projected precipitation

Correcting systematic bias in derived hydrologic simulations – implications for climate change assessments

Watershed-Scale, Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Water Resources Impacts from Climate Change