The current status of Group B Streptococcus infection in the reproductive tract of late-pregnancy women and its impact on pregnancy outcomes

Hui Ma,JingWen Xu,YanHong Zhang,RenYan Zhang,Jie Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07343-8
2024-01-25
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Abstract:ObjectiveAnalyze Group B Streptococcus (GBS) infection in late-pregnancy pregnant women in Shanghai, the risk factors of GBS infection, and its impact on pregnancy outcomes, providing guidance for early prevention and treatment in clinical practice.MethodsWe selected 12,132 late-pregnancy pregnant women admitted from January 2022 to December 2022 as the research subjects. Based on the GBS test results of reproductive tract secretion samples from pregnant women, 210 cases of GBS positive pregnant women were randomly selected as the observation group, and 200 cases of GBS negative pregnant women were selected as the control group. The risk factors of infection and the impact on pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe GBS colonization rate of pregnant women in this study was 6.52%; the incidence of Vaginal delivery and Neonatal infection in GBS positive group was significantly higher than that in GBS negative group (P < 0.05); with Neonatal infection as the dependent variable, and the GBS infection, Vaginal delivery and GDM of the elderly and women in late pregnancy as independent variables, the results showed that GBS infection of women in late pregnancy was an independent risk factor for Neonatal infection.ConclusionClinical practice should attach great importance to GBS infection in late pregnancy, strengthen GBS screening in late pregnancy, and actively implement the strategy of intrapartum antibiotic intervention (IAP), which is of great significance in reducing the vertical infection rate of maternal and infant GBS and improving the quality of newborn birth.
obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?