Abstract:Objective: Motor vehicle crashes remain a significant problem. Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) have the potential to reduce crash incidence and severity, but their optimization requires a comprehensive understanding of driver-specific errors and environmental hazards in real-world crash scenarios. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to quantify contributing factors using the Strategic Highway Research Program 2 (SHRP 2) Naturalistic Driving Study (NDS), identify potential ADAS interventions, and make suggestions to optimize ADAS for real-world crash scenarios. Methods: A subset of the SHRP 2 NDS consisting of at-fault crashes (n = 369) among teens (16-19 yrs), young adults (20-24 yrs), adults (35-54 yrs) and older adults (70+ yrs) were reviewed to identify contributing factors and potential ADAS interventions. Contributing factors were classified according to National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey pre-crash assessment variable elements. A single critical factor was selected among the contributing factors for each crash. Case reviews with a multidisciplinary panel of industry experts were conducted to develop suggestions for ADAS optimization. Critical factors were compared across at-risk driving groups, gender, and incident type using chi-square statistics and multinomial logistic regression. Results: Driver error was the critical factor in 94% of crashes. Recognition error (56%), including internal distraction and inadequate surveillance, was the most common driver error sub-type. Teens and young adults exhibited greater decision errors compared to older adults (p < 0.01). Older adults exhibited greater performance errors (p < 0.05) compared to teens and young adults. Automatic emergency braking (AEB) had the greatest potential to mitigate crashes (48%), followed by vehicle-to-vehicle communication (38%) and driver monitoring (24%). ADAS suggestions for optimization included (1) implementing adaptive forward collision warning, AEB, high-speed warning, and curve-speed warning to account for road surface conditions (2) ensuring detection of nonstandard road objects, (3) vehicle-to-vehicle communication alerting drivers to cross-traffic, (4) vehicle-to-infrastructure communication alerting drivers to the presence of pedestrians in crosswalks, and (5) optimizing lane keeping assist for end-departures and pedal confusion. Conclusions: These data provide stakeholders with a comprehensive understanding of critical factors among at-risk drivers as well as suggestions for ADAS improvements based on naturalistic data. Such data can be used to optimize ADAS for driver-specific errors and help develop more robust vehicle test procedures.

Benchmarks for retrospective automated driving system crash rate analysis using police-reported crash data

Benchmarks for Retrospective Automated Driving System Crash Rate Analysis Using Police-Reported Crash Data

Dynamic Benchmarks: Spatial and Temporal Alignment for ADS Performance Evaluation

Comparison of Waymo Rider-Only Crash Data to Human Benchmarks at 7.1 Million Miles

RAVE Checklist: Recommendations for Overcoming Challenges in Retrospective Safety Studies of Automated Driving Systems

Exploratory analysis of injury severity under different levels of driving automation (SAE Level 2-5) using multi-source data

Comparative safety performance of autonomous- and human drivers: A real-world case study of the Waymo Driver

Exploratory analysis of injury severity under different levels of driving automation (SAE Levels 2 and 4) using multi-source data

In-depth analysis of crash contributing factors and potential ADAS interventions among at-risk drivers using the SHRP 2 naturalistic driving study

A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologies

Comparative Safety Assessment of Automated Driving Strategies at Highway Merges in Mixed Traffic

Comparability of Automated Vehicle Crash Databases

How do environmental and road factors impact automated vehicle crashes? An evidence from ADAS and ADS

Assessing the collective safety of automated vehicle groups: A duration modeling approach of accumulated distances between crashes

Initial Indications of Safety of Driverless Automated Driving Systems

Methods to Estimate Advanced Driver Assistance System Penetration Rates in the United States

Advancing investigation of automated vehicle crashes using text analytics of crash narratives and Bayesian analysis

Safety assessment of highly automated driving systems in test tracks: A new framework.

Cohort-Based Analysis Structure for Modeling Driver Behavior with an In-Vehicle Data Recorder

Safety in higher level automated vehicles: Investigating edge cases in crashes of vehicles equipped with automated driving systems