Surgical Tray Optimization in the Setting of Cleft Lip and Palate Reconstruction: Implications for Operative Cost and Efficiency

Matteo Laspro,Leya Groysman,Lucas R. Perez Rivera,Anna Mae Geolingo,Henry Tong,Marina Nakos-Athanasiou,David L. Tran,David A. Staffenberg,Roberto L. Flores
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241293705
2024-10-30
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Abstract:The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal, Ahead of Print. ObjectivesTo assess surgical instrument usage in cleft lip (CL) and cleft palate (CP) surgery and create an optimized surgical tray with an associated cost-savings analysis.DesignProspective, observational study.SettingSingle institution, 6-month prospective review.Patients/ParticipantsA total of 10 primary CL surgeries and 10 primary CP surgeries were included in this study.InterventionComplete lists of surgical instruments utilized in CL and CP surgeries were collected.Main Outcome Measurements:Utilization fractions (UFs) were calculated as the percentages of average used instruments to averaged opened instruments per case. New optimized CL and CP surgical trays were idealized by removing instruments not used in at least 20% of cases, and a cost analysis was performed to identify potential savings. Calculation of annual potential savings was also conducted based on institutional caseload.ResultsThe average instrument UFs were 26.0% for CL and 22.6% for CP. The estimated costs were 290.29 for the original CL surgical tray and 63.80 for the optimized tray. For CP, the original tray's cost was estimated at 319.00, and the optimized tray at 57.42. This demonstrates a cost reduction of 226.49 for CL and $29.07 to 261.58 for CP.ConclusionsThe idealized surgical instrument tray could contribute to reducing healthcare expenditures and promoting operating room efficiency, patient safety, and environmentally friendlier operating theaters.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine,surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?