Life threatening epilepsy in a child.
T. Kuroiwa,H. Morita,H. Tanabe,T. Ohta
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.57.11.1440
1994-11-01
Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Abstract:cerebellar syndrome. These patients usually have cerebellar cortical atrophy.2 Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia resembles idiopathic cerebellar ataxia in many respects. Like idiopathic cerebellar ataxia, autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia is a late onset disorder that may present as a pure cerebellar disorder or in combination with non-cerebellar symptoms. Neuropathological findings in idiopathic cerebellar ataxia and autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia are often indistinguishable. These phenomenological similarities have prompted the hypothesis that at least some cases of idiopathic cerebellar ataxia arise from spontaneous mutation of a gene responsible for autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia, from non-paternity, or falsely appear sporadic due to incomplete pedigree data.14 The recent discovery of an expanded trinucleotide repeat mutation in the SCAl region in American families with autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia offers the opportunity to search for this mutation in isolated patients with idiopathic cerebellar ataxia by the polymerase chain reaction.5 We have analysed DNA from 61 patients with idiopathic cerebellar ataxia with a mean age of 53-6 (SD 12-8) years and a mean disease duration of 9-2 (SD 47) years. All patients satisfied the following diagnostic criteria: (a) progressive, otherwise unexplained ataxia, and (b) family history without evidence of heredity or consanguinity of parents. All diagnoses were made after exclusion of possible symptomatic causes (alcoholism, other toxic causes, malignancy, hypothyroidism, vitamin deficiency, inflammatory, metabolic, or vascular causes). Twenty five patients had a pure cerebellar syndrome (idiopathic cerebellar ataxia-C), whereas 36 had additional non-cerebellar symptoms (idiopathic cerebellar ataxia-P). Of these, 17 fulfilled the clinical criteria for probable multiple system atrophy.3 Polymerase chain reaction analysis was performed, as described by Orr et al.5 For comparison, DNA from 144 patients with autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia was analysed. As a positive control, DNA from families with autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia from Yakut tribes from Siberia was included, in which the SCAI expansion has been demonstrated and sequenced. A diagnosis of SCAl heterozygocity was made in five out of 19 German families with autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia for which the family history was medically documented. This corresponds to a prevalence of SCAl in German families with autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia of about 25%. By contrast, the SCAl expansion was found in none of the 61 cases of idiopathic cerebellar ataxia. The present results argue against the hypothesis that a relevant number of cases of idiopathic cerebellar ataxia are due to a trinucleotide expansion at the SCAl locus. The importance of our failure to show a mutation of the SCAl gene in patients with idiopathic cerebellar ataxia is underlined by the finding that the SCAl mutation is present in a considerable proportion of German families with autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia. Our data do not exclude the possibility that some cases of idiopathic cerebellar ataxia are due to spontaneous mutations at other gene loci associated with autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia. Linkage studies provide evidence that there are at least two other gene loci (SCA2 and SCA3) for autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia.67 The hypothesis that idiopathic cerebellar ataxia is due to a mutation at one of these loci cannot be tested at present because SCA2 and SCA3 genes are not identified. It is unlikely that a recessive gene defect accounts for many cases of idiopathic cerebellar ataxia because recessive inheritance of a late onset ataxic disorder has been documented only very rarely. It therefore seems likely that most cases of idiopathic cerebellar ataxia are non-inherited. This hypothesis is supported by a recent study reporting discordance for idiopathic cerebellar ataxia in monzygous triplets.4 In addition, detailed clinical, neuroradiological, and neuropathological investigations show subtle differences between idiopathic cerebellar ataxia and autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia. Thus age of onset is more variable and tends to be lower in autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia. Additional noncerebellar features of idiopathic cerebellar ataxia are often parkinsonism and autonomic failure, whereas ophthalmoplegia, pyramidal signs, dystonia, and amyotrophy are more common in autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia. Pathological and neuroradiological studies show that there is frequent spinal involvement in autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia but not in idiopathic cerebellar ataxia.2 Finally, postmortem studies have shown the presence of oligodendroglial intracytoplasmatic inclusions in the brains of patients with sporadic olivopontocerebellar atrophy, but not in the brains of patients with dominantly inherited olivopontocerebellar atrophy.8 T KLOCKGETHER K BURK J B SCHULZ J DICHGANS Department ofNeurology, University of Tubingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany K WESSEL Department ofNeurology, University ofLiubeck, RatzeburgerAllee 160, D-23562 Lubeck, Germany G AUBURGER Department ofNeurology, University of Duisseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, D-40225 Dasseldorf, Germany