Elasticstable intramedullary nails versus external fixation for femoral shaft fracture in children: A Meta-analysis
陈星光,邹承达,薛鸣丰,戴加平,张中伟,陈刚,王晓东
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn421158-20190609-00396
2020-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacies and complications of elastic stable intramedullary nails (ESIN) versus external fixation (EF) for femoral shaft fracture in children.Methods:The databases of Wanfang, VIP, CNKI, Chinese Biomedical Database, EMbase and PubMed were searched for comparative studies of ESIN versus EF for managing femoral shaft fracture in children. After extracting literature reports and quality evaluations, RevMan 5.3 software was ultilized for systematic review. The satisfaction degree of efficacy at the last follow-up, malunion, refracture, infection, skin irritation, leg length discrepancy, fixation failure, activity limitation of hip or knee joint and the relevant time parameters (e.g. operative duration, hospital stay, clinical healing time & bone healing time) were analyzed.Results:A total of 17 literature reports were included for this meta-analysis.According to different treatment methods, they were divided into two groups of ESIN (n=385) and EF (n=347). No significant inter-group difference existed in the satisfaction degree of efficacy at the last follow-up [
RR=0.98, 95%
CI(0.90, 1.06),
P=0.55], leg length discrepancy [
RR=2.44, 95%
CI(0.88, 6.71),
P=0.09], fixation failure [
RR=2.38, 95%
CI(1.01, 5.60),
P=0.05], activity limitation of hip/knee joint [
RR=2.12, 95%
CI(0.34, 13.06),
P=0.42] and operative duration [
RR=0.15, 95%
CI(-1.08, 1.38),
P=0.82]. Meta-analysis indicated that ESIN group was superior to EF group in the aspects of refracture [
RR=3.31, 95%
CI(1.53, 7.18),
P=0.002], infection [
RR=7.72, 95%
CI(4.12, 14.44),
P<0.00 001], malunion [
RR=3.01, 95%
CI(1.22, 7.40),
P=0.02], hospital stay [
RR=1.18, 95%
CI(0.19, 2.16),
P=0.02], clinical healing time [
RR=0.89, 95%
CI(0.45, 1.33),
P<0.0 001] and bone healing time [
RR=0.89, 95%
CI(0.39, 1.40),
P=0.005]. However, ESIN group was inferior to in skin irritation [
RR=0.17, 95%
CI(0.06, 0.46),
P=0.0 006].
Conclusions:As compared with EF, the advantages of ESIN are reliable curative effect, shorter hospital stay, faster fracture healing and fewer complications. And ESIN is recommended for femoral shaft fracture without serious injury of soft tissue. Larger sample size, double-blind and high-quality randomized controlled trials are warranted for confirming that conclusion.