Development and Validation of a 18F-FDG PET/CT-Based Clinical Prediction Model for Estimating Malignancy in Solid Pulmonary Nodules Based on a Population with High Prevalence of Malignancy.
Hao-Yue Guo,Jun-Tao Lin,Hao-Hua Huang,Yuan Gao,Mei-Ru Yan,Ming Sun,Wei-Ping Xu,Hong-Hong Yan,Wen-Zhao Zhong,Xue-Ning Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2019.07.014
IF: 4.84
2020-01-01
Clinical Lung Cancer
Abstract:Development and validation of models that incorporate F-18-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) indices and are based on large sample size to diagnose solid pulmonary nodules are warranted. We developed a prediction model based on PET/CT using 8 identified malignant predictors (312 patients in the training set and 159 in the validation set); the model reduced the frequency of indeterminate nodules and improved the sensitivity and accuracy of prediction. Our model is clinically useful for thoracic surgeons and oncologists as a diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making tool. Purpose: To develop a prediction model based on F-18-fludeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for solid pulmonary nodules (SPNs) with high malignant probability. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of CT-undetermined SPNs, which were further evaluated by PET/CT between January 2008 and December 2015. A total of 312 cases were included as a training set and 159 as a validation set. Logistic regression was applied to determine independent predictors, and a mathematical model was deduced. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was compared to other models. Model fitness was assessed based on the American College of Chest Physicians guidelines. Results: There were 215 (68.9%) and 127 (79.9%) malignant lesions in the training and validation sets, respectively. Eight independent predictors were identified: age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.030], male gender (OR = 0.268), smoking history (OR = 2.719), lesion diameter (OR = 1.067), spiculation (OR = 2.530), lobulation (OR = 2.614), cavity (OR = 2.847), and standardized maximum uptake value of SPNs (OR = 1.229). Our AUCs (training set, 0.858; validation set, 0.809) was better than those of previous models (Mayo: 0.685, P = .0061; Peking University People's Hospital: 0.646, P = .0180; Herder: 0.708, P = .0203; Zhejiang University: 0.757, P = .0699). The C index of the nomogram was 0.858. Our model reduced the diagnosis of indeterminate nodules (26.4% vs. 79.2%, 53.5%, 39.6%, and 34.0%, respectively) while improved sensitivity (81.3% vs. 16.4%, 49.2%, 62.5%, and 68.0%, respectively) and accuracy (65.4% vs. 16.4%, 39.6%, 52.8%, and 58.5%, respectively). Conclusion: Our model could permit accurate diagnoses and may be recommended to identify malignant SPNs with high malignant probability, as our data pertain to a very high-prevalence cohort only. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.