Three Series of Heterometallic NiII-LnIII Schiff Base Complexes: Synthesis, Crystal Structures and Magnetic Characterization.
Lin Jiang,Yue Liu,Xin Liu,Jinlei Tian,Shiping Yan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c7dt02351k
IF: 4
2017-01-01
Dalton Transactions
Abstract:Three series of NiII-LnIII complexes were synthesized with the general formulae [(μ3-CO3)2{Ni(HL)(CH3-CH2OH)Ln(CH3COO)}2]·2CH3CH2OH (1-6) (Ln = Tb (1), Dy (2), Ho (3), Er (4), Tm (5), Yb (6); H3L = N,N'-bis(3-methoxysalicylidene)-1,3-diamino-2-prop-anol), [Ni(HL)Ln(dbm)3]·CH3OH2·2CH2Cl2 (7-10) (Ln = Tb (7), Eu (8), Gd (9), Ho (10); Hdbm = 1,3-diphenyl-1,3-propanedione) and [Ni(HL)(H2O)(tfa)Ln(hfac)2] (11-15) (Ln = Tb (11), Dy (12), Eu (13), Gd (14), Ho (15); Hhfac = 1,1,1,5,5,5-hexafluoropentane-2,4-dione, tfa- = trifluoroacetate) using compartmental Schiff base ligands in conjunction with auxiliary ligands. For the NiLn series, the tetranuclear structure could be considered as two NiII-LnIII dinuclear subunits bridged by two carbonates derived from atmospheric carbon dioxide. The LnIII ions of complexes 1-6 were octa-coordinated with distorted triangular dodecahedral geometry, while the LnIII ions of the dinuclear complexes 7-15 were nona-coordinated with distorted muffin geometry. The magnetic properties of the three series complexes were studied using dc and ac magnetic measurements. For the NiII-GdIII complexes, the dc magnetic susceptibility measurements suggested the existence of the anticipated ferromagnetic interaction between NiII and GdIII ions. The fitting of the χMT vs. T data processed by PHI software provided the parameters g = 2.08 (J = +0.87 cm-1) for 9 and g = 2.02 (J = +1.83 cm-1) for 14. The interaction exchange was magneto-structurally correlated to the Ni-O-Gd angle (α) and Ni(μ-O)Gd dihedral angle (β). With an applied dc field, complexes 1 (Tb), 2 (Dy), 7 (Tb) and 12 (Dy) exhibited single magnetic relaxation with SMM parameters of Ueff/k = 13.60 K, 11.52 K, 7.69 K and 5.14 K, respectively. Analysis of the Cole-Cole plots for complexes 2 and 7 suggested that a single relaxation process was mainly involved in the relaxation process, with α values in the range of 0.37-0.17 and 0.14-0.11, respectively.