Comparing the adsorption of micropollutants on activated carbon from anaerobically stored, organics-depleted, and nitrified urine
Aurea Heusser,Anne Dax,Christa S McArdell,Kai M Udert
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.121615
2024-06-15
Abstract:Separate collection and treatment of urine optimizes nutrient recovery and enhances micropollutant removal from municipal wastewater. One typical urine treatment train includes nutrient recovery in three biological processes: anaerobic storage, followed by aerobic organics degradation concurrently with nitrification. These are usually followed by activated carbon adsorption to remove micropollutants. However, removing micropollutants prior to nitrification would protect nitrifiers from potential inhibition by pharmaceuticals. In addition, combining simplified biological treatment with activated carbon adsorption could offer a cheap and robust process for removing micropollutants where nutrient recovery is not the first priority, as a partial loss of ammonia occurs without nitrification. In this study, we investigated whether activated carbon adsorption could also take place between the three biological treatment steps. We tested the effectiveness of micropollutant removal with activated carbon after each biological treatment step by conducting experiments with anaerobically stored urine, organics-depleted urine, and nitrified urine. The urine solutions were spiked with 19 pharmaceuticals: amisulpride, atenolol, atenolol acid, candesartan, carbamazepine, citalopram, clarithromycin, darunavir, diclofenac, emtricitabine, fexofenadine, hydrochlorothiazide, irbesartan, lidocaine, metoprolol, N4-acetylsulfamethoxazole, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, venlafaxine, and two artificial sweeteners, acesulfame and sucralose. Batch experiments were conducted with powdered activated carbon (PAC) to determine how much activated carbon achieve which degree of micropollutant removal and how organics, pH, and speciation change from ammonium to nitrate influence adsorption. Micropollutant removal was also tested in granular activated carbon (GAC) columns, which is the preferred technology for micropollutant removal from urine. The carbon usage rates (CUR) per person were lower for all urine solutions than for municipal wastewater. The results showed that organics depletion would be needed when micropollutant removal was the sole aim of urine treatment, as the degradation of easily biodegradable organics prevented clogging of GAC columns. However, CUR did hardly improve with organics-depleted urine compared to stored urine. The lowest CUR was achieved with nitrified urine. This resulted from the additional organics removal during nitrification and not the lower pH or the partial conversion of ammonium to nitrate. In addition, we showed that the relative pharmaceutical removal in all solutions was independent of the initial pharmaceutical concentration unless the background organics matrix changed considerably. We conclude that removal of micropollutants in GAC columns from organics-depleted urine can be performed without clogging, but with the drawback of a higher carbon usage compared to removal from nitrified urine.