Abstract:Although a number of methodological studies and conceptual frameworks offer guidance on standardised sampling, pan trap setups vary widely in characteristics. To gauge methodological variation, we systematically reviewed peer‐reviewed studies that used pan traps for bee collection and assessed the studies using a set of relevant methodological criteria. For obtaining evidence that pan trap samples and floral environment around traps are correlated, we screened the relevant studies for such correlations. The use of coloured pan traps (bee bowls, Moericke traps) for sampling bees (and other pollinators) has continuously increased over the last two decades. Although a number of methodological studies and conceptual frameworks offer guidance on standardised sampling, pan trap setups vary widely in characteristics even when optimised for capturing bees. Moreover, some uncertainty persists as to how local flower abundance and diversity influence sampling. We systematically reviewed peer‐reviewed studies that used pan traps for bee collection and that were listed in the Web of Science core collection. To gauge methodological variation, we identified a set of relevant methodological criteria and assessed the studies accordingly. For obtaining evidence that pan trap samples and floral environment around traps are correlated, we screened the relevant studies for such correlations. While some aspects of pan trapping (e.g., trap coloration and elevation) were similar in the majority of studies, other aspects varied considerably (e.g., trap volume/diameter and sampling duration). Few studies used floral abundance and/or diversity as an explanatory variable in their analyses of bee samples. Among these studies, we found a considerable variation in key aspects of floral survey methods, such as time and space between vegetation surveys and pan trap sampling, abundance measures (quantitative, semi‐quantitative and presence–absence), and processing of raw data prior to analysis. Often studies did not find any correlation between the floral environment and bee samples. Reported correlations varied markedly across studies, even within groups of studies applying a similar method or analysing a similar group of bees. Our synthesis helps to identify key issues of further standardisation of pan trap methodology and of associated floral surveys. In addition to the few aspects that have been standardised over the past decades, we suggest methodological direction for future research using pan traps as a better standardised method for the collection of wild bees. We encourage further studies to illuminate if and how varying floral resources around traps bias bee samples from pan traps. More generally, our synthesis shows that trapping methodologies should be reviewed regularly when their use increases to ensure standardisation.

May we improve trapping of drosophilid species (Insecta, Diptera)? A review of sampling protocols in Brazilian biomes

Improving monitoring tools for spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii

Multistate Comparison of Attractants and the Impact of Fruit Development Stage on Trapping Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Raspberry and Blueberry

Sampling Hymenoptera along a precipitation gradient in tropical forests: the effectiveness of different coloured pan traps

Standardising bee sampling: A systematic review of pan trapping and associated floral surveys

Strategies for Establishing a Rearing Technique for the Fruit Fly Parasitoid: Doryctobracon brasiliensis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)

Increased capture efficiency of Scolytinae with modified semi-funnel trap model

A novel trap design for non-lethal monitoring of dung beetles using eDNA metabarcoding

Scalable camera traps for measuring the attractiveness of sugar baits for controlling malaria and dengue vectors

Use of colored fruit-baited traps for trapping Cerambycidae (Coleoptera: Chrysomeloidea) reveals six new records for the state of Rondônia, southwestern Brazilian Amazon

Trapping Triatominae Bugs Using Mice-Baited Traps along the Peninsula of Baja California, Mexico

Testing a trapping protocol for generic surveillance of wood-boring beetles in heterogeneous landscapes

Evaluation of the DN-Mini (miniaturized double net) trap for sampling host-seeking Anopheles mosquitoes in malaria-endemic villages of southern Tanzania

A baited trap for kissing bugs (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae)

Outcomes from international field trials with Male Aedes Sound Traps: Frequency-dependent effectiveness in capturing target species in relation to bycatch abundance

Biosurveillance for invasive insect pest species using an environmental DNA metabarcoding approach and a high salt trap collection fluid

A multimodal bait for trapping blood-sucking arthropods

Effects of fruit‐baited trap height on flower and leaf chafer scarab beetles sampling in Amazon rainforest

Understanding Bactrocera dorsalis trapping to calibrate area‐wide management

The Presence and Accessibility of Competitive Resources Affect Trapping Efficiency of Spotted-Wing Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae)

DNA High-Throughput Sequencing for Arthropod Gut Content Analysis to Evaluate Effectiveness and Safety of Biological Control Agents