A non-structural fuzzy decision method developed for organic Rankine cycles used in liquid-dominated geothermal fields of medium/high temperature
Na Zhang,Qinggang Wang,Zhibin Yu,Guopeng Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.113861
IF: 10.4
2021-03-01
Energy Conversion and Management
Abstract:<p>A reliable decision-making method is of great importance for the designing of a practical and efficient organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system employed to exploit geothermal energy. This paper develops a three-level non-structural fuzzy decision algorithm for the comprehensive evaluation of a geo-fluid driven trans-critical ORC (TORC) system on the basis of a progressive system performance hierarchy, involving environmental characteristics, safety, thermodynamic and techno-economic performance. Two representative geothermal reservoirs with medium (GR-I) and high (GR-II) temperature are investigated to realize and validate the proposed method. Four mathematical models and six working fluids with thirteen indexes are developed to fulfill the performance evaluation and decision-making courses. Parametric analysis results of the decision criteria are conducted including specific net out power (<span class="math"><math>APnet</math></span>), thermal efficiency (<span class="math"><math>ηt</math></span>), exergy efficiency (<span class="math"><math>ηe</math></span>), heat transfer area per net output power (APR) and electricity production cost (EPC), and the different performance of TORC for GR-I and GR-II are fully revealed. As for the GR-I, the result of the three-level fuzzy decision ranking order is R142b, R134a, R290, R1270, R227ea and R143a. In regard to the GR-II, it's R142b, R1270, R134a, R290, R227ea and R143a. Both show that R142b performs best. In the GR-I and GR-II, R142b obtains the maximal <span class="math"><math>APnet</math></span> of 110.94 kW/(kg·s<sup>−1</sup>) and 198.14 kW/(kg·s<sup>−1</sup>), the maximal <span class="math"><math>ηt</math></span> of 14.05% and 14.43%, the maximal <span class="math"><math>ηe</math></span> of 51.42% and 42.90%, the minimal APR of 0.262(m<sup>2</sup>/kW) and 0.185(m<sup>2</sup>/kW), the minimal EPC of 0.030($/(kW·h)) and 0.022($/(kW·h)).</p><p>Summarily, this three-level fuzzy decision evaluation method can provide important guidance and decisive solution by concisely display the pros and cons for each ORC scheme of geothermal resource utilization.</p>
energy & fuels,thermodynamics,mechanics