PO0322: Salvage Interstitial Rectal Brachytherapy: A Single Institution Retrospective Analysis

Amandeep Taggar,Mackenzie Smith,Shady Ashamalla,Moti Paudel,Kevin Martell,Sylvia Ng,Michael Raphael,Deepak Dinakaran,Shun Wong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8140(24)03730-7
IF: 2.441
2024-10-27
Brachytherapy
Abstract:Purpose Salvage interstitial rectal brachytherapy (SIRB) is a promising therapeutic modality for patients facing recurrent anorectal malignancies. This study undertakes a detailed examination of patients who underwent SIRB, highlighting the efficacy and response to treatment. Additionally, we present our findings on potential toxicities, providing valuable information to enhance the understanding of the safety profile of interstitial brachytherapy. Materials and Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted, encompassing all patients diagnosed with locally recurrent anal, rectal, and colon cancer situated within the pelvic cavity and treated with 3D image-guided interstitial brachytherapy between January 2018 and December 2023. Data collection included patient demographics, prior treatment history, brachytherapy dosimetry, post-SIRB treatments, and toxicity outcomes. Descriptive statistics were reported using median values with inter-quartile range or absolute count data. Cumulative incidence of failure was then analyzed. Results Thirteen patients (9 adenocarcinoma and 4 squamous cell carcinoma) with a median follow-up of 15.3 (10.3-21.6) months post SIRB were identified. Four of these received EBRT boost. Median clinical target volume (CTV) was 25.9 (18.8-75.2) cc. Median SIRB dose was 17.3 (14-18.5) Gy in 3(2-3) and 24 (15-42) Gy in 5(3-6) fractions with or without EBRT boost, respectively. Total minimum dose to the 90% of CTV (CTVD90) and 98% of GTV (GTVD98) in 2Gy equivalents (EQD2) were 80.1 (76.6-100.4) Gy and 97.3 (79.4-111.5) Gy, respectively, for the entire cohort. Twelve patients demonstrated complete response (CR) based on radiological (n=9), clinical (n=6), and/or biochemical (n=3) assessments. One patient did not demonstrate CR and had local in-field recurrence within 10 months post SIRB. Five and 8 patients developed regional out-of-field and distant recurrence, with median time to recurrence 12.9 months (6.2-16.5 months) and 15.3 months (4.8-40.8 months), respectively. Grade ≥2 toxicity was observed in 8 patients including 3 G2 toxicities (rectal bleeding, vaginal stricture, and pelvic pain) and 5 G3/4 toxicities (necrotic abscess, ulceration, ureteric obstruction, uretero-vaginal and cutaneous fistula). Patients who developed necrosis had a larger median CTV volume (89.4 cc versus 16.8cc, p=0.08) and higher volume that received 200% of dose (V200: 14.8 cc versus 3.4 cc, p=.41), compared to those that did not develop necrosis. Ten patients were still alive at last available follow-up. Conclusions Salvage interstitial rectal brachytherapy (SIRB) is an effective treatment modality for addressing locally recurrent anorectal cancer in the pelvis. SIRB offers robust local control with a favorable toxicity profile. Establishment of formalized treatment dose prescriptions and dosimetric parameters is imperative to enhance the consistency and reproducibility of this therapeutic approach. Future endeavors should prioritize prospective studies to gather comprehensive data, further refining and standardizing the implementation of SIRB in the clinical setting.
oncology,radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?