Abstract:Introduction Autistic children commonly receive simultaneous services from various health‐care and other professionals, including occupational therapy, throughout their journey of diagnosis and consequent therapeutic support. Current best practice guidelines for supporting autistic youth emphasise the importance of interprofessional collaboration. Despite this, collaboration among health‐care professionals does not always occur, and little is understood about clinicians' experiences of collaborative care. The aim of this study was to explore Australian paediatric occupational therapists' experiences of interprofessional collaboration and their perception of factors influencing collaboration when supporting autistic children. Methods This study employed an exploratory qualitative descriptive design. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 13 Australian paediatric occupational therapists involved in service provision to autistic children. Questions explored clinicians' experiences and perceptions of interprofessional collaboration. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to inductively analyse data. Consumer and Community Consultation This study was conceptualised and conducted by a team of researchers with a range of personal and professional experiences with the autistic community. The research design was strongly informed by the Autism CRC'S research guidelines. Findings Three themes were generated highlighting factors that influence collaboration between occupational therapists and other professionals. The first emphasised that 'clinicians' capacity to collaborate' at both organisational and individual levels was understood to be greatly influenced by funding structures. The second emphasised that 'relationships are key to collaboration' with these often established through shared workplaces or clients. The third, 'shared perceptions make collaboration easier' described how shared perceptions of collaboration, the occupational therapy role, and autism‐related frames of reference were perceived to influence interprofessional collaboration. Conclusion Findings indicate that, while occupational therapists perceive interprofessional collaboration as valuable in the support of autistic children, there are barriers to effective collaboration, particularly in the context of a marketised service delivery model. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY This study looked at how Australian occupational therapists work with other professionals to support autistic children. Even though it is recommended that professionals work together to support autistic children and their families, this does not always happen. In this study, researchers interviewed 13 occupational therapists and asked what it is like working with other professionals, what is helpful, and what makes working together difficult. From these interviews, it was found that many things affect how well occupational therapists can work with other health professionals and teachers to support autistic children. Factors like funding and workplace rules affect how professionals work together. Having someone take on the role of leader and having good relationships between professionals made it easier to work together. It was also helpful when occupational therapists and other professionals shared similar ideas on how to support autistic children. The study could be improved if it had gathered more information about the occupational therapists' education and what they have learnt about working with other professionals. Overall, the therapists in this study believed that working together to support autistic children and their families was important, but that there are many challenges to making this happen. More research on this topic would be helpful.

Exploring occupational therapy practice in Australian residential aged care facilities: A cross‐sectional survey

Osteopathic health care in aged care facilities: The experience of practitioners in an emerging practice setting

Enhancing occupational therapy service provision with military veterans through policy reform: Findings from a national survey

The type and scope of physiotherapy is under-utilised in Australian residential aged care facilities: a national, cross-sectional survey of physiotherapists

Role of occupational therapy in person‐centred dementia care: Exploring family member and clinician perceptions

Occupational therapy – Meeting the needs of older adult workers?

A Profile of Occupational Therapists Working in School-Based Practice in Australian Primary Schools

Australian occupational therapy academic workforce: An examination of retention, work-engagement, and role overload issues

Fitness to drive practices among non-driver trained occupational therapists in an Australian community-based rehabilitation setting

Occupational therapy practice for post‐acute COVID‐19 inpatients requiring rehabilitation

Occupational therapy with patients in forensic solitary confinement: A qualitative study

How occupational therapists are perceived within inpatient mental health settings: the perceptions of seven Australian nurses

An Investigation of the Professional Resilience Strategies Used by Experienced Occupational Therapists

Research-related knowledge, understanding and practice in public mental health: the voices of social workers and occupational therapists

Occupation-Based Interventions to Improve Occupational Performance Among Older Adults Living in Long-Term Care: A Systematic Review

Seeking residents' views regarding Australian residential aged care: A scoping review

Exploring Australian dietitians' experiences and preparedness for working in residential aged care facilities

Practice, Knowledge and Needs of Occupational Therapy Practitioners Providing Services to Parents with Physical Impairments: A Pilot Study

Reforming allied health service provision in residential aged care to improve the rehabilitation reach: a feasibility study

Occupational therapy experiences of interprofessional collaboration in the support of autistic children

An international study of diversity in occupational therapy research– A bibliographic review of English research literature