Abstract:Does every Boolean tautology have a short propositional-calculus proof? Here, a propositional-calculus (i.e. Frege) proof is any proof starting from a set of axioms and deriving new Boolean formulas using a fixed set of sound derivation rules. Establishing any super-polynomial size lower bound on Frege proofs (in terms of the size of the formula proved) is a major open problem in proof complexity, and among a handful of fundamental hardness questions in complexity theory by and large. Non-commutative arithmetic formulas, on the other hand, constitute a quite weak computational model, for which exponential-size lower bounds were shown already back in 1991 by Nisan [20], using a particularly transparent argument. In this work we show that Frege lower bounds in fact follow from corresponding size lower bounds on non-commutative formulas computing certain polynomials (and that such lower bounds on non-commutative formulas must exist, unless NP=coNP ). More precisely, we demonstrate a natural association between tautologies T to non-commutative polynomials p , such that: •if T has a polynomial-size Frege proof then p has a polynomial-size non-commutative arithmetic formula; and conversely, when T is a DNF, if p has a polynomial-size non-commutative arithmetic formula over GF (2) then T has a Frege proof of quasi-polynomial size. The argument is a characterization of Frege proofs as non-commutative formulas: we show that the Frege system is (quasi-) polynomially equivalent to a non-commutative Ideal Proof System (IPS), following the recent work of Grochow and Pitassi [10] that introduced a propositional proof system in which proofs are arithmetic circuits, and the work in [35] that considered adding the commutator as an axiom in algebraic propositional proof systems. This gives a characterization of propositional Frege proofs in terms of (non-commutative) arithmetic formulas that is tighter than (the formula version of IPS) in Grochow and Pitassi [10], in the following sense: (i) The non-commutative IPS is polynomial-time checkable -- whereas the original IPS was checkable in probabilistic polynomial-time; and (ii) Frege proofs unconditionally quasi-polynomially simulate the non-commutative IPS -- whereas Frege was shown to efficiently simulate IPS only assuming that the decidability of PIT for (commutative) arithmetic formulas by polynomial-size circuits is efficiently provable in Frege.

Coarsening natural deduction proofs II: finding gaunt proofs

Coarsening Natural Deduction Proofs I: Finding Perfect Proofs

Proofs that Modify Proofs

The naturality of natural deduction (II). Some remarks on atomic polymorphism

A short proof of the Strong Normalization of Classical Natural Deduction with Disjunction

Even shorter proofs without new variables

Exponentially Huge Natural Deduction proofs are Redundant: Preliminary results on $M_\supset$

Canonical Proof nets for Classical Logic

A logic of judgmental existence and its relation to proof irrelevance

Proof-Theoretic Semantics, a Problem with Negation and Prospects for Modality

Non-Commutative Formulas and Frege Lower Bounds: a New Characterization of Propositional Proofs.

A proof-theoretical approach to some extensions of first order quantification

Peano and Osgood theorems via effective infinitesimals

Circular (Yet Sound) Proofs

Equivalence of Intuitionistic Inductive Definitions and Intuitionistic Cyclic Proofs under Arithmetic

Cyclic proofs for arithmetical inductive definitions

Formalization, Mechanization and Automation of Gödel's Proof of God's Existence

Proof-theoretic methods in quantifier-free definability

Meaning and identity of proofs in a bilateralist setting: A two-sorted typed Lambda-calculus for proofs and refutations

Weighted, Circular and Semi-Algebraic Proofs

Investigations into Proof Structures