Abstract:Does every Boolean tautology have a short propositional-calculus proof? Here, a propositional-calculus (i.e. Frege) proof is any proof starting from a set of axioms and deriving new Boolean formulas using a fixed set of sound derivation rules. Establishing any super-polynomial size lower bound on Frege proofs (in terms of the size of the formula proved) is a major open problem in proof complexity, and among a handful of fundamental hardness questions in complexity theory by and large. Non-commutative arithmetic formulas, on the other hand, constitute a quite weak computational model, for which exponential-size lower bounds were shown already back in 1991 by Nisan [20], using a particularly transparent argument. In this work we show that Frege lower bounds in fact follow from corresponding size lower bounds on non-commutative formulas computing certain polynomials (and that such lower bounds on non-commutative formulas must exist, unless NP=coNP ). More precisely, we demonstrate a natural association between tautologies T to non-commutative polynomials p , such that: •if T has a polynomial-size Frege proof then p has a polynomial-size non-commutative arithmetic formula; and conversely, when T is a DNF, if p has a polynomial-size non-commutative arithmetic formula over GF (2) then T has a Frege proof of quasi-polynomial size. The argument is a characterization of Frege proofs as non-commutative formulas: we show that the Frege system is (quasi-) polynomially equivalent to a non-commutative Ideal Proof System (IPS), following the recent work of Grochow and Pitassi [10] that introduced a propositional proof system in which proofs are arithmetic circuits, and the work in [35] that considered adding the commutator as an axiom in algebraic propositional proof systems. This gives a characterization of propositional Frege proofs in terms of (non-commutative) arithmetic formulas that is tighter than (the formula version of IPS) in Grochow and Pitassi [10], in the following sense: (i) The non-commutative IPS is polynomial-time checkable -- whereas the original IPS was checkable in probabilistic polynomial-time; and (ii) Frege proofs unconditionally quasi-polynomially simulate the non-commutative IPS -- whereas Frege was shown to efficiently simulate IPS only assuming that the decidability of PIT for (commutative) arithmetic formulas by polynomial-size circuits is efficiently provable in Frege.

Constructive Patterns of Logical Truth

Three Dogmas, a Puzzle and its Solution

The expressive language ALCNHR+K(D) for knowledge reasoning

The Algorithm of Islamic Jurisprudence (Fiqh) with Validation of an Entscheidungsproblem

Positive Logic with Adjoint Modalities: Proof Theory, Semantics and Reasoning about Information

Universal Logic as a Science of Patterns

LEGO-like Small-Model Constructions for Åqvist's Logics

Towards Intuitive Reasoning in Axiomatic Geometry

Logic and computation as combinatorics

Semantical Analysis of Intuitionistic Modal Logics between CK and IK

An experimental study of classical truth logic on multi-propositions consistent and incompatible: Dual-process theories and modal syllogistic of deduction

Minimal Predicates, Fixed-Points, and Definability

07441 Summary -- Algorithmic-Logical Theory of Infinite Structures.

Logical Primes, Metavariables and Satisfiability

Non-Commutative Formulas and Frege Lower Bounds: a New Characterization of Propositional Proofs.

Modal Foundations for Predicate Logic.

Universal Proof Theory: Feasible Admissibility in Intuitionistic Modal Logics

Constructive completeness and non-discrete languages

Abstraction Logic: A New Foundation for (Computer) Mathematics

General dynamic logic

Computational logic: its origins and applications