Abstract:Objectives: To evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris and to determine the remaining filling material on the root canal walls by microcomputed tomography (micro-CT), following the root canal retreatment of root canals filled with different obturation techniques (single cone technique, thermoplasticised injection technique) and the different root canal sealers [bioceramic-based, epoxy resin-based root canal sealer]. Materials and methods: 60 single rooted human premolar teeth were prepared with the ProTaper Gold system (Dentsply Maillefer) up to the F4 file and the samples were divided into 4 groups according to obturation procedures: Single cone technique + AH Plus sealer(epoxy resin-based root canal sealer, Dentsply International Inc., York, PA, USA); Single cone technique + Sure-Seal Root(bioceramic-based root canal sealer, Sure Dent Corporation, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea); thermoplastic injection technique[Calamus Dual Obturation System(Dentsply-Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK, USA)] + AH Plus(Dentsply International Inc.); Sure-Seal Root(Sure Dent Corporation) + Calamus Dual Obturation System (Dentsply-Tulsa Dental). The teeth were inserted into preweighed Eppendorf tubes and retreatment was performed. The tubes were kept in an incubator at 37 °C for 14 days to obtain the dry debris weight. Following the removal of the root canal fillings, the samples were scanned with a micro-CT device to analyse the volume of filling residues. Results: Retreatment of samples obturated with epoxy-resin or bioceramic based root sealers combined with Calamus system resulted in higher amount of apical extrusion compared to their combination with single cone technique (p = 0.026 for Single cone technique + AH Plus sealer vs Calamus + AH Plus sealer and p = 0.005 for Single cone technique + Sure-Seal root sealer vs Calamus + Sure-Seal root sealer). The most debris was observed in the Calamus + Sure-Seal root sealer group, the least debris was observed in the Single cone technique + AH Plus sealer group. The percentage of residues was the highest in the Single cone technique + Sure-Seal root sealer and the lowest in the Calamus + AH Plus sealer group, but there were no significant differences between groups (p = 0.463). Conclusions: No correlation was observed among the groups in terms of extruded debris and remnants inside the root canal. When combined with bioceramic based sealer, thermoplasticised injection technique did not affect the cleanliness of root canal walls; however, it increased its apical extrusion potential during retreatment. Clinical relevance: The obturation method does not play a role in the removability of bioceramic based root canal sealer, however the use of bioceramic-based root canal sealers with cold obturation techniques may be beneficial in preventing apical extrusion.

Outcomes and prognostic factors of endodontically treated teeth filled with calcium silicate‐ or epoxy resin‐based root canal sealers: A retrospective cohort study

Outcome of Root Canal Treatment Using Warm Vertical Compaction with Bioceramic and Resin-Based Sealers: A Randomised Clinical Trial.

Clinical outcome of non-surgical root canal treatment using different sealers and techniques of obturation in 237 patients: A retrospective study

Outcome of Root Canal Treatments Using a New Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealer: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial

Clinical Outcome Evaluation of The Effectiveness of Calcium Hydroxide as A Root Canal Sealer Constituent

Penetration of Calcium Silicate and Epoxy Resin Sealers Into the Lateral Canals

Influence of sealer type on treatment outcome of teeth with apical periodontitis: a systematic review

Evaluation of the Sealing Ability and Bond Strength of Two Endodontic Root Canal Sealers: An In Vitro Study

Clinical outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment using NeoSealer Flo and Endosequence BC Sealer: A retrospective analysis with short-term follow-up

The efficacy of premixed bioceramic sealers versus standard sealers on root canal treatment outcome, extrusion rate and post‐obturation pain: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Comparing the incidence of postoperative pain after root canal filling with warm vertical obturation with resin-based sealer and sealer-based obturation with calcium silicate-based sealer: a prospective clinical trial

Root canal cleanliness and debris extrusion following retreatment of thermoplastic injection technique and bioceramic-based root canal sealer

Genetics of preneoplasia: lessons from lung cancer.

Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealers: A Narrative Review and Clinical Perspectives

Evaluation of Sealer Remnants Using a Bioceramic Sealer Single-cone Technique after Post Space Preparation and Its Influence on the Adhesion of Fibre Posts in Vitro.

The effect of sealer type and obturation technique on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots

A micro-computed tomographic evaluation of root canal filling with a single gutta-percha cone and calcium silicate sealer

Comparative Cytocompatibility and Mineralization Potential of Bio-C Sealer and TotalFill BC Sealer

Comparison sealing ability in three bioceramic sealers applied in hydraulic condensation technique by using micro-computed tomography

Comparison of apical sealing ability of bioceramic sealer and epoxy resin-based sealer using the fluid filtration technique and scanning electron microscopy

[Periapical Microleakage of Root Canals Filled with Four Kinds of Sealers Using Two Obturation Techniques].