Abstract:Individuals sometimes direct help preferentially towards those who have helped others. This is typically explained in terms of indirect reciprocity where individuals who give to others increase their own chance of receiving help from third parties. Here, I consider whether a strategy of helping those who help others can spread simply because the strategy benefits other discriminating helpers. "Helping those who help others" appears to be a widespread phenomenon. It is typically framed as indirect reciprocity in which individuals who are seen to help later receive returns from third parties. Here, I propose that helping can also be explained by the benefits that result from helping related helpers (where relatedness means sharing genes more than average, whether due to genealogy or some other mechanism). I test the functional roles of relatedness (or "kin selection") and of reciprocity in explaining helping by varying the population structure and the number of interactions in individual‐based simulations. First, with a unitary population in which individuals had a greater tendency to meet others of their own type, there were high levels of a discriminating strategy which helped other helpers. This can be explained by kin selection, in which helpers who help other helpers increase the payoff of their own strategy despite incurring a cost themselves. Introducing an "island population" structure reduced these indirect fitness benefits from helping, and this caused the frequency of the discriminating strategy to decrease markedly. Finally, increasing the number of interactions caused only a small increase in the level of the discriminating strategy (and thereby of helping helpers), consistent with indirect reciprocity (by means of the simplest strategy) being very weak. I argue that relatedness requires greater attention as an alternative to indirect reciprocity in explaining why individuals might help those who help others.

Helping those who help others: The roles of indirect reciprocity and relatedness

Kin-discriminating partner choice promotes the evolution of helping

Diminishing returns drive altruists to help extended family

Helping Yourself Before Helping Others: How Sense of Control Promotes Charitable Behaviors

Help anyone, if helped by some: Understanding generalized reciprocity through the lens of interaction ritual chain theory

Relatedness and synergies of kind and scale in the evolution of helping

The evolution of cooperation and diversity by integrated indirect reciprocity

Foraging associations are related with helping interactions in a cooperatively breeding bird

Infestation of the human brain with Coenurus cerebralis in human brain.

Kinship can hinder cooperation in heterogeneous populations

Groupwise information sharing promotes ingroup favoritism in indirect reciprocity

[On the problem of tumor immunology. II].

The co-evolution of direct, indirect and generalized reciprocity

Upstream reciprocity in heterogeneous networks

Visceral leishmaniasis and splenomegaly.

Evolution of cooperation with asymmetric social interactions

Ingroup favoritism and intergroup cooperation under indirect reciprocity based on group reputation

Cooperation and Competition Between Relatives

Indirect reciprocity with stochastic rules

When, why, and for whom is receiving help actually helpful? Differential effects of receiving empowering and nonempowering help based on recipient gender.

Evolution of contingent altruism when cooperation is expensive