Accuracy of Various Forms of Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Chun Zhao,Hongyan Dai,Juwei Shao,Qian He,Wei Su,Peng Wang,Qiuyue Tang,Junren Zeng,Song Xu,Juanjuan Zhao,Shutian Xiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.680691
IF: 4.7
2021-12-07
Frontiers in Oncology
Abstract:Background Contrast-enhanced MRI can be used to identify patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, studies around the world have found differing diagnostic accuracies for the technique. Hence, we designed this meta-analysis to assess the accuracy of contrast-enhanced MRI for HCC diagnosis. Methods We conducted a systematic search for all studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MRI for HCC in the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SCOPUS, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar from inception until January 2021. We used the “Midas” package from the STATA software to perform the meta-analysis. Results Our study was based on 21 publications with 5,361 patients. The pooled HCC diagnosis sensitivity and specificity were 75% (95% CI, 70%–80%) and 90% (95% CI, 88%–92%), respectively, for gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI; and they were 70% (95% CI, 57%–81%) and 94% (95% CI, 85%–97%), respectively, for MRI with extracellular contrast agents (ECA-MRI). We found significant heterogeneity with a significant chi-square test and an I 2 statistic >75%. We also found significant publication bias as per Deeks’ test results and funnel plot. Conclusion We found that both types of contrast-enhanced MRI are accurate diagnostic and surveillance tools for HCC and offer high sensitivity and specificity. Further studies on different ethnic populations are required to strengthen our findings.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?