Abstract:Many methods are being tried for rapid and accurate identification of sepsis-causing microorganisms. We analyzed the performance of three different preparation methods [MBT Sepsityper IVD Kit (Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Germany), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) lysis, and differential centrifugation with protein extraction (Centrifugation +PE)] and compared in standard and Sepsityper modules of the Bruker Biotyper MALDI-TOF MS for direct identification of bacteria from 240 positive blood culture bottles of BACTEC FX (Becton Dickinson, USA). By using the standard module, correct identification at species level (score ≥2) was done in 46.7% of the samples with SDS lysis, 44.2% with centrifugation +PE, and 25.4% with the Sepsityper kit. These ratios at the genus level (score range 1.70-1.99) were 34.6%, 31.3%, and 32.5%, respectively. With SDS lysis (195), more bacteria were identified correctly than centrifugation +PE (181) and the Sepsityper kit (139). A statistically significant difference was found between SDS and the Sepsityper kit and Centrifugation +PE and the Sepsityper kit (P < 0.001, both). By using the Sepsityper module, correct identification at species level (score ≥1.8) was determined in 74.2% of the samples with SDS lysis and centrifugation +PE each and 55% with the Sepsityper kit. These ratios at the genus level (score range 1.60-1.79) were 16.3%, 10%, and 19.2%, respectively. SDS lysis (217) had significantly higher identification rates than centrifugation +PE (202) and the Sepsityper kit (178) (P = 0.028 and P < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was also observed between centrifugation +PE and the Sepsityper kit (P < 0.001). Best performance was obtained with SDS lysis among the methods. Although better performance was achieved by using Sepsityper software module, risk of misidentification should not be ignored. Importance: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition, and rapid and accurate identification of the causative microorganisms from blood cultures is crucial for timely and effective treatment. Although there are many studies on direct identification from blood cultures with MALDI-TOF MS, further standardization is still needed. In our study, we analyzed the performance of three different preparation methods and compared by using two analysis modules of the Bruker Biotyper MALDI-TOF MS for direct identification of bacteria from numerous positive blood culture bottles. The literature reports a limited number of studies that compare different preparation methods for direct blood culture identification, processing a large number of blood samples concurrently and evaluating the same samples as in our study. Moreover, although SDS is used very frequently in medical laboratories, there are few studies on direct identification from blood culture bottles. In our study, the highest correct identification rate was observed with the SDS method.

Diagnostic performance of an automated robot for MALDI target preparation in microbial identification

Validation of a novel automatic deposition of bacteria and yeasts on MALDI target for MALDI-TOF MS-based identification using MALDI Colonyst robot

Evaluation of the Bruker MALDI Biotyper for Identification of Gram-Positive Rods: Development of a Diagnostic Algorithm for the Clinical Laboratory

A multicenter evaluation of Copan's Colibrí™, an automated instrument for MALDI TOF MS target application for bacterial identification

Evaluation of species-specific score cutoff values of routinely isolated clinically relevant bacteria using a direct smear preparation for matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry-based bacterial identification

A head-to-head comparison of three MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry systems with 16S rRNA gene sequencing

A Side by Side Comparison of Bruker Biotyper and VITEK MS: Utility of MALDI-TOF MS Technology for Microorganism Identification in a Public Health Reference Laboratory

Application of the biocopolymer preparation system, rapid BACpro® II kit, for mass-spectrometry-based bacterial identification from positive blood culture bottles by the MALDI Biotyper system

Automated preparation for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing: evaluation of a research use only prototype, the BD Kiestra IdentifA/SusceptA system

Comparison of MBT Biotargets with MBT steel targets for Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time of Flight mass spectrometry identifications of microorganisms in a clinical microbiology laboratory.

Comparison of biomarker based Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and conventional methods in the identification of clinically relevant bacteria and yeast

A novel MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry sample preparation strategy for improved proteomic biotyping of clinically significant Mycobacteria

Evaluation of three sample preparation methods for the identification of clinical strains by using two MALDI‐TOF MS systems

Evaluation of Autof MS2600 and MBT Smart MALDI-TOF MS Systems for Routine Identification of Clinical Bacteria and Yeasts

Investigation of different methods in rapid microbial identification directly from positive blood culture bottles by MALDI-TOF MS

MALDI-TOF MS: A Reliable Tool in the Real Life of the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory

Identification methods as a factor affecting the performance of clinical microbiology laboratories participating in an external quality assessment program: a cross-sectional, retrospective analysis

MALDI-TOF Direct Identification of Positive Blood Cultures: A Four-Year analytical Evaluation of a Triton based workflow

Optimized Use of the MALDI BioTyper System and the FilmArray BCID Panel for Direct Identification of Microbial Pathogens from Positive Blood Cultures

Rapid Identification of Pathogenic Organisms Positive for Blood Culture by MALDI-TOF Mass Spec-Trometry in Combination with Sepsityper Kit or Serum-Separating Gel Tubes

A side-by-side comparison of the new VITEK MS PRIME and the MALDI Biotyper sirius in the clinical microbiology laboratory