Repair strength of 3D‐printed denture base resins: Effect of surface treatment and repair material type

Mohammed M. Gad,Hawra M. Al Hamad,Fatimah M. Almohsin,Shaimaa M. Fouda,Sultan Akhtar,Soban Q. Khan,Ahmed Rahoma,Faisal D. Al‐Qarni,Nadim Z. Baba,Fahad A. Al‐Harbi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13925
2024-08-28
Journal of Prosthodontics
Abstract:Purpose The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of surface treatment and repair materials on the flexural strength of repaired 3D‐printed denture base resins after thermal aging. Materials and methods Bar‐shape specimens (64 × 10 × 3.3 mm) were designed as intact (control) specimens while repair specimens were printed in sections with 2.5 mm space for repair material. Printing was performed with either ASIGA or NextDent denture base material. In each material, one group received no surface treatment, while other repair groups were subjected to one of three surface treatments: (1) monomer application, (2) aluminium oxide particles‐abrasion, or (3) both methods (aluminum oxide particles‐abrasion and monomer application). Pairs were fixed in a customized mold then repaired with either autopolymerizing acrylic resin or flowable composite (n = 9). Repaired specimens were incubated for 48 h at 37°C in distilled water and then subjected to thermal cycling (5000 cycles). A 3‐point bending test was used to evaluate the flexural strength using a universal testing machine, and mode of failure determined followed by fractured surface analysis using scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test (α = 0.05). Results Both resin materials showed a significant decrease in the flexural strength of repaired specimens when compared to control ones (p 0.05), which were higher than those treated with aluminum oxide particles abrasion alone (p
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?