Abstract:This paper takes the 2014 pilot project of accelerated depreciation of fixed assets as a quasi-natural experiment, and builds a Propensity Score Matching-Difference in Differences (PSM-DID) model based on the data of Chinese listed companies from 2000 to 2019 to test the impact of tax preference on enterprise investment efficiency and its mechanism. The results show that the policy inhibits supported enterprises investment efficiency significantly. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the policy causes greater investment efficiency losses for small and medium-sized enterprises, non-state-owned enterprises and asset-heavy enterprises. The mechanism test found the reason why the policy eased financing constraints but inhibited investment efficiency in short-term. After a variety of robustness tests, the above basic conclusions are still valid. Although the accelerated depreciation policy of fixed assets is conducive to expanding the scale of investment, the incentive effect on investment efficiency is not obvious, and even shows a restraining effect. Given the existence of heterogeneity, the design of the policy should not only distinguish industries, but also pay attention to the differences between different enterprises in the same industry. Strengthening research and development (R&D) innovation and improving the matching mechanism between human capital and fixed investment will help give full play to the incentive effect of this policy. The research in this paper helps to deepen the understanding of the microeconomic effects of tax policy and identify the internal mechanism, which not only enriches the relevant literature, but also provides a reference for the government to better use tax policy to promote the high-quality development of enterprises.

Capital tax incentives and firm innovation: evidence from accelerated depreciation in China

Tax incentive and technology innovation performance: An empirical study of high-tech enterprises in Hangzhou, China

Investment Incentives and the Relative Demand for Skilled Labor: Evidence from Accelerated Depreciation Policies in China

The Impact of Technology Identification Policy on Firm Innovation: Evidence from China

Investment Incentives and Leverage: Evidence from China’s Accelerated Depreciation Policy

Tax Incentive and Firm Investment: Evidence from the Income Tax Revenue Sharing Reform in China

Macro tax incentives and corporate sustainable innovation: Evidence from Chinese Enterprises

Tax incentive, R&D investment and firm innovation: Evidence from China

Tax Compliance and Investment Incentives: Firm Responses to Accelerated Depreciation in China

Enterprise income tax and corporate innovation: evidence from China

Investment Incentives, Financial Constraints, and Innovation

Accelerated depreciation tax policy and multiple-product firms' export behaviour: evidence from China

Structural tax reduction, financing constraint relief and enterprise innovation efficiency

R&D Tax Credits and Firm Innovation: Evidence from China

Investment Tax Credits and Innovation

Tax incentives and corporate innovation: Evidence from China's value‐added tax reform

Corporate tax policy and heterogeneous firm innovation: Evidence from a developing country

Tax preference, financing constraints and enterprise investment efficiency-Experience, of China's enterprises investment

Tax Incentives and Maturity Mismatch between Investment and Financing: Evidence from China

Corporate Innovation Incentive Policy During Business Cycles: Fiscal Subsidies or Tax Incentives?