Comparison of mindfulness training and acceptance and commitment therapy in a workplace setting: results from a randomized controlled trial

Vasiliki Christodoulou,Paul E. Flaxman,Eric M. J. Morris,Joseph E. Oliver

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2024.2314934

2024-03-13

European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

Abstract:Mindfulness interventions have become a common feature of worksite stress management provision. However, the evidence underpinning these interventions continues to attract scrutiny, with unresolved questions surrounding: the generalizability of mindfulness research findings to real-world workplace training applications, comparability of different mindfulness approaches offered in workplace settings, and effects on job performance. The current trial contributes to the literature by exploring effects of mindfulness training (MT) and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), which were delivered to staff in the same healthcare organization. Participants were randomly assigned to a 4-session MT program ( n = 63), a 4-session ACT program ( n = 67), or a waiting list control group ( n = 69). Study measures were administered on five occasions spread across a 6-month period. Results indicated that both MT and ACT reduced perceived stress and improved mindfulness and sleep quality when compared to the control group. ACT showed slight superiority in helping employees align their behaviour with personal values. Neither MT nor ACT was effective in reducing work limitations. We consider explanations for equivocal effects on job performance outcomes, and highlight the importance of testing the effectiveness of worksite mindfulness interventions under ecologically valid conditions.

psychology, applied,management

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to address the following key issues:

1. **Comparison of the effects of Mindfulness Training (MT) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)**: The study examines MT and ACT programs implemented in the same healthcare institution and compares their impact on employees' mindfulness levels, perceived stress, well-being, and work efficiency.

2. **Evaluation of effectiveness in actual work environments**: To ensure the study results are meaningful, the trial uses shortened versions (4 sessions) of the MT and ACT programs to reflect training practices in real workplace settings. Additionally, the programs are open to all interested employees, increasing inclusivity.

3. **Examination of long-term effects**: By conducting a six-month study with measurements at five different time points, the research assesses the sustained effects of the interventions.

4. **Exploration of the relationship between mindfulness and work performance**: Although it is generally believed that mindfulness interventions can enhance work performance, existing evidence is insufficient. The paper explores how mindfulness can improve work performance through self-regulation mechanisms, with a particular focus on the indicator of "work limitations," which refers to how emotional or physical discomfort interferes with work efficiency.

In summary, this paper uses a randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of two psychological interventions in a real work environment, with a particular focus on their specific impacts on stress management, sleep quality, and work performance.