Synergistic Anti-Tumor Effects of Newcastle Disease Virus and Doxorubicin: Evidence from A Murine Breast Cancer Model
Hamed Sabri,Mahdieh Shokrollahi Barough,Ehsan Zafari,Mahdi Pakjoo,Mehdi Mahdavi,Fatemeh Esmaeili,Somaye Sadeghi,Ramin Sarrami-Forooshani
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2024.113481
2024-12-25
Abstract:Background: Despite the recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains a clinical challenge due to its aggressive nature and resistance to conventional therapies. Virotherapy has emerged as a promising cancer treatment strategy, leveraging the ability of viruses to specifically target and replicate in cancerous cells. This study evaluated the oncolytic potential of a combined therapeutic strategy, utilizing Newcastle disease virus (NDV) and Doxorubicin hydrochloride (Dox) both in vitro and in vivo. Methods: The in vitro experiments involved exposing human and mouse TNBC cell lines (MDA-MB-231 and 4T1, respectively) to NDV and Dox, individually or in combination. Cell viability assays and flow cytometry analyses were conducted to assess the synergistic effects of NDV and Dox on regulating breast cancer cell behavior in vitro. Furthermore, the immune-stimulating potential of NDV was investigated by examining its effects on dendritic cell (DC) maturation using flow cytometry and T cell proliferation. The in vitro anti-tumor effects of NDV were examined in both parental and tamoxifen-resistant cancer cells to assess its efficacy against chemoresistance. Animal models of breast cancer were treated with NDV in combination with Dox. The body weight changes, tumor volume, and survival rates of the mice were monitored throughout the study. Histopathological analyses were conducted to evaluate the potential toxic effects of the treatments. Results: Based on the MTT results, NDV at optimal concentrations synergized the effect of Dox to reduce the viability of both MDA-MB231 and 4T1 cell lines (Isobologram combination index of less than 1). Additionally, individual treatment with NDV was able to significantly reduce the viability of patient-derived breast cancer cells, compared to the untreated control (P < 0.05) without affecting the cells of normal adjacent tissue. Furthermore, a combination of NDV and Dox significantly enhanced the percentage of early and late apoptotic cells in MDA-MB-231 (P < 0.0001) and late apoptotic cells in 4T1 (P < 0.0001), in comparison with individual treatment with these agents. Flow cytometry results showed that, compared to wild type MDA-MB-231 cells, NDV-infected MDA-MB-231 cells were better inducers of T cell proliferation and DC maturation as evidenced by increased proliferation index (P < 0.05) and elevated expression of CD1a, CD83, and CD86 (P < 0.0001), respectively. Moreover, co-treatment of both wild-type and (tamoxifen) TAM-resistant MCF-7/TAMR-1 cells with TAM and NDV significantly reduce the viability of the cancer cells (P < 0.0001). In tumor-bearing mice locally engrafted with 4T1 cells, combined treatment of NDV and Dox exhibited a marked reduction in median tumor volume compared to the control group, validating our in vitro findings on their synergistic anti-tumor effects. These findings suggest that combining NDV with Dox can effectively inhibit tumor progression and has the potential to reduce the dose, and consequently the toxic side-effects, of Dox in breast cancer therapy.