What’s in a cover?

Jemima Coleman,Wendy Sadler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-7058/37/02/20

2024-02-01

Physics World

Abstract:Jemima Coleman and Wendy Sadler say that science magazines have a responsibility to ensure that science is accessible and inclusive for all.

physics, multidisciplinary

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

JAS Volume 41 Issue 2 Cover and Front Matter

Geoffrey Samuel,James Foard Jurgen,Steven Kemper,Peter Suttmeier,Shinjae Chung,David Dapice,Orville Schell,Chu Hsi,Hyun Cheol Chung,Yung Chang,Ting‐Jen Hsueh,Chu Chen,John M. Norman,Suzanne M. Wilson,Bin Li,Anthony C. Yu,Donald K. Layman,Sherman Cochran,B. H. Terrell,Edward Laves ',William N. Jones,John F. Copper,James J. Parsons,Paul Pckowicz,Michael Weininger,Paul D. Buell,Robert N. Kent,Guy Syrokomla- Stefanowska,Daniel J. Gardner,John Fincher,A. F. P. Hulsewé,Thomas Hellman Morton,David R. Johnson,Dan Lévy,Bruce J. Esposito,J. M. Larsen,Roger Des Forges,Robert N. Smith,Susan Pharr,Keith Brown,Andrew Edmund Goble,Stephen Pelz,Brett de Bary,Stephen Large,Bruno Kahn,Joyce K. Kallgren,Guy S. Alitto,Susan Matisoff,Karl Moskowitz,Barbara D. Metcalf,Charles Keyes,Elizabeth Keyes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021911800072375

1982-01-01

Abstract:An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature

Jennie S. Brotman,Felicia M. Moore

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20241

IF: 4.6

2008-11-01

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Abstract:Despite valuable syntheses of the field of gender and science education, there has not been a systematic, comprehensive review of the literature on gender and science education in recent years. We examine the literature pertaining to girls' engagement in science and develop four themes (equity and access, curriculum and pedagogy, the nature and culture of science, and identity) that we believe provide a coherent picture of the different kinds of approaches happening currently, while at the same time allowing for discussion of how ideas in the field have progressed and changed over time. We present new questions and approaches for further research that arise when applying insights from these themes to ongoing work in gender and science education. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 45: 971–1002, 2008

education & educational research
In Science Journals

Sacha Vignieri,Jake S Yeston,Marc S Lavine,Jesse Smith,Caroline Ash,Mattia Maroso,Melisa Yashinski,Christiana N Fogg,Bianca Lopez,Stella M Hurtley,Peter Stern,Keith T Smith,Brent Grocholski,Wei Wong,Courtney Malo,Amos Matsiko

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ads7401

IF: 56.9

2024-08-30

Science

Abstract:Highlights from the Science family of journals.
Three recommended inclusive language guidelines for scholarly publishing: Words matter

Sabrina J. Ashwell,Patricia K. Baskin,Stacy L. Christiansen,Sara A. DiBari,Annette Flanagin,Tracy Frey,Racquel Jemison,Mia Ricci

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1527

2023-02-02

Learned Publishing

Abstract:Key points Inclusive language will make scholarly publishing more accurate and more respectful, and it has the potential to help authors reach a wider audience. JAMA and the JAMA Network journals, the American Chemical Society and the Coalition for Diversity and Inclusion in Scholarly Communications have free guides on inclusive language, formatting and images. The guides provide principles and rationale, as well as examples of preferred language, in order to equip people with knowledge to choose the most inclusive words even as terminology preferences change.

information science & library science
The changing roles of scientific journals

Arturo Casadevall,Lorraine F. Clark,Ferric C. Fang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02515-24

IF: 6.4

2024-10-05

mBio

Abstract:ABSTRACT After centuries of relative stability, the scientific publishing world has undergone tremendous disruption and change during the first decades of the 21st century. The causes for disruption can be traced to the information revolution, which brought such benefits as rapid publication, greater connectivity, and ready access to large databases, along with less desirable practices including image manipulation, plagiarism, and other ethical transgressions. The information revolution has driven the proliferation of journals, expansion of for-profit academic publishing, and empowerment of the open-access movement, each of which has exerted new financial pressures on traditional publishing models. As journals became the focal point for ethical concerns in science, they have adapted by increasing the scope of their duties, which now include archiving of data, enforcement of good practices, establishment of standards for rigor, and training the next generation of reviewers and editors. Here, we consider the seismic changes occurring in scientific publishing and place them into the context of a rapidly changing landscape of scientific and publishing norms.

microbiology
Opening Up of Editorial Activities at Chemistry Journals. What Does Editorship Mean and What Does It Involve?

Marianne Noel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.747846

2022-03-24

Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics

Abstract:The article unpacks the publishing practices and focuses on the curating work carried out by the editors of chemistry journals. Based on a qualitative analysis of multiple sources in two publishing houses (the American Chemical Society, ACS and Nature Research), it first shows that the role of editor-in-chief covers a wide range of realities and is far from being limited to that of a gatekeeper (the most common metaphor in the literature). In journals that are part of the Nature Research portfolio, in-house editors, who are no longer active scientists, work full time for the journals. The article describes the professional trajectories and skills required to join the publishing house. Interviews highlight collective identity-based actions, attention to the growth and the flow of manuscripts, but also specific epistemic properties of outputs in chemistry. Besides tasks that editors outline “as really the same as they were 100 years ago,” as they spend most of their time handling manuscripts and providing quality assurance, they also travel to conferences to support journals and encourage submissions, visit labs where researchers pitch their work or ask questions about journals, and “educate the actors themselves” about new fields. In both cases studied, the publishing houses partner with institutions to offer events (ACS on Campus programme, Nature masterclass) that a university or department can freely host or buy, where editors organize workshops on all aspects of manuscript preparation. Second, publishing houses, whether non-for-profit or commercial, have embraced a catalog logic, where the journals are not necessarily in competition and have an assumed place and hierarchy. At Nature Research, editors-in-chief head business units inscribed in the company's organization. Despite standardized processes imposed by the procedural chain, there is still room to maneuver in these relatively autonomous structures that are ultimately evaluated on their results (the annual production of a certain number of high-quality papers). On the other hand, ACS is seen as a vessel whose course cannot easily be deviated. The conclusion calls for extending this type of investigation to other contexts or types of journals.
Women in science : Materials

Maria Chiara Bignozzi,Jacqueline Johnson,Patricia Krawczak,Emilia Morallón,Ming Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/FMATS.2021.668092

2021-01-01

Frontiers in Materials

Abstract:According to UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) data (UIS fact sheet, 2019), less than 30% of researchers worldwide are women. Long-standing biases and gender stereotypes are discouraging girls and women away from science related fields. In particular, STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) research is traditionally male dominated and women remain underrepresented. As UNESCO has highlighted, both science and gender equality are, however, essential to ensuring sustainable development. In order to change traditional mindsets, gender equality must be promoted, stereotypes defeated, and girls and women should be encouraged to pursue careers in STEM.\r\nThroughout history, the contributions of female researchers to scientific progress have been extremely important. Yet, whereas the extraordinarily talented Nobel laureate Marie Sklodowska-Curie is often mentioned as a role model, it is nowadays well established that countless women such as Lise Meitner have received less recognition and acknowledgement for their research findings than their male counterparts (so-called Matilda effect (Rossiter, 1993)).\r\nAlso, women traditionally publish less than men according to the European Commission She Figures, the ratio of women to men among authors of scientific publications in the EU being on the average one to two (EU, 2018), and recent surveys are highlighting a further drop in academic submissions from female scientists since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic early 2020.\r\nRole models are definitely extremely important to show to younger generations the growing impact of female researchers to science. Therefore, continuing the spirit of the International Day of Women and Girls in Science, Frontiers in Materials is proud to offer this platform to promote the work of female scientists, across the breadth of materials science and engineering.\r\nThis inaugural ‘Women in Science: Materials’ collection (Fig.1) aims to highlight the impact of women researchers working in materials science and engineering. It gathers a selection of original articles with the lead author and/or corresponding author being a woman.\r\n32 contributions (3 reviews, 1 brief research report and 28 original research articles) present advances in theory, experiment and methodology with applications to compelling problems, across almost all sections of the journal:\r\n Mechanics of materials (Bouquerel et al., Jeong et al., TerMaath et al., Zhu et al.);\r\n Smart materials (Duc et al.);\r\n Polymeric and composite materials (Badji et al., Berzin et al., Brunella et al., Hostettler et al., Martins and Gil, Mirbaha et al., Padhan et al., Quintana et al., Raj et al., Saffar et al.);\r\n Carbon-based materials (Kato et al., Moulefera et al., Xu et al., Zhang et al.);\r\n Structural materials (Bonoli et al., Boyer et al., Korat and Ducman, Manzi et al., Masi et al.);\r\n Colloidal materials and interfaces (Garcia-Hernando et al., Pucci et al.);\r\n Energy materials (Castro-Gutierrez et al.);\r\n Ceramics and glass (Giosue et al.);\r\n Environmental materials (Bassi et al.);\r\n Biomaterials (Criado-Gonzalez et al., Kebaili et al.);\r\nThe Guest Editorial team hope that this collection of papers will be the foundation of an international network of women researchers working in materials science and engineering, and a starting point for future collaborations and discussions.
We need better and more PopSci by scientists

Agustín Fuentes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adq8026

IF: 56.9

2024-07-19

Science

Abstract:Any scientist knows that to be a good scientist, they must conduct thoughtful research; generate high-quality, verifiable results and analyses; and get them into circulation in the scientific community. However, what often goes underappreciated is that this good science will likely remain ignored by most of the world if one doesn't find a way to get it out beyond the scientific community. Unfortunately, when it comes to making our science accessible, we scientists all too often fall short. And that's when the nonscientist public turn to other nonscientists they can understand. Hence, we find ourselves in a world shaped by a lot of misguided, and often erroneous, information about science.

multidisciplinary sciences
Can scientists and their institutions become their own open access publishers?

Karen Shashok

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1701.02461

2017-01-10

Abstract:This article offers a personal perspective on the current state of academic publishing, and posits that the scientific community is beset with journals that contribute little valuable knowledge, overload the community's capacity for high-quality peer review, and waste resources. Open access publishing can offer solutions that benefit researchers and other information users, as well as institutions and funders, but commercial journal publishers have influenced open access policies and practices in ways that favor their economic interests over those of other stakeholders in knowledge creation and sharing. One way to free research from constraints on access is the diamond route of open access publishing, in which institutions and funders that produce new knowledge reclaim responsibility for publication via institutional journals or other open platforms. I argue that research journals (especially those published for profit) may no longer be fit for purpose, and hope that readers will consider whether the time has come to put responsibility for publishing back into the hands of researchers and their institutions. The potential advantages and challenges involved in a shift away from for-profit journals in favor of institutional open access publishing are explored.

Digital Libraries,Computers and Society
Scientific journals should be transformed into science storytellers to improve their visibility

Kwangil Oh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.255

2021-08-20

Science Editing

Abstract:What is the objective for science journals to publish research papers? Would it be enough to collect research manuscripts and simply publish them in print or on the web? Science journal publishers have always strived to find ways of disseminating journal content to as many readers as possible. It is now time for science journal publishers to think about why a journal should be published; whether it is acceptable for valuable scientific findings to lie dormant in a journal’s archive; and whether traditional science communication is still effective. The present article suggests that science journals should transform themselves into science storytellers to improve the visibility and discoverability of their research findings. First, a new communication network between journals, authors, peers, the public, and policymakers is required. Second, conversion of media from academic language to plain language is critical to broadening the audience. Third, audio-visual content should be introduced into journal publishing to facilitate easy comprehension of the content. Fourth, research-focused channels, including EurekAlert, Medium, and social networking service channels are recommended as new media to propagate journals’ content to researchers. Improving visibility and discoverability is an urgent mission, especially for small society journals. To achieve this mission, science journals should be adapted to become storytellers and science communicators, as suggested above. A small society journal’s editor is not merely an editor, but an editor-publisher; therefore, editors should understand and take on this role.
Addressing Challenges to Public Understanding of Science: Epistemic Cognition, Motivated Reasoning, and Conceptual Change

Gale M. Sinatra,Dorothe Kienhues,Barbara K. Hofer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.916216

2014-04-03

Educational Psychologist

Abstract:Science is of critical importance to daily life in a knowledge society and has a significant influence on many everyday decisions. As scientific problems increase in their number and complexity, so do the challenges facing the public in understanding these issues. Our objective is to focus on 3 of those challenges: the challenge of reasoning about knowledge and the processes of knowing, the challenge of overcoming biases in that reasoning, and the challenge of overcoming misconceptions. We propose that research in epistemic cognition, motivated reasoning, and conceptual change can help to identify, understand, and address these obstacles for public understanding of science. We explain the contributions of each of these areas in providing insights into the public's understandings and misunderstandings about knowledge, the nature of science, and the content of science. We close with educational recommendations for promoting scientific literacy.

education & educational research,psychology, educational
Black women on the academic tightrope: four scholars weigh in

Malika Jeffries-EL,Monica R. McLemore,Ruby Zelzer,Tiara Moore

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-03342-0

IF: 64.8

2024-10-16

Nature

Abstract:The work of addressing the inequities in science must not fall just on those most affected. The work of addressing the inequities in science must not fall just on those most affected.

multidisciplinary sciences
Protecting and promoting editorial independence

Kamaldeep Bhui,Aileen O'Brien,Rachel Upthegrove,Alexander C. Tsai,Mustafa Soomro,Giles Newton-Howes,Matthew R. Broome,Andrew Forrester,Patricia Casey,Anne M. Doherty,William Lee,Kenneth R. Kaufman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2024.6

2024-02-16

The British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract:Summary We argue that editorial independence, through robust practice of publication ethics and research integrity, promotes good science and prevents bad science. We elucidate the concept of research integrity, and then discuss the dimensions of editorial independence. Best practice guidelines exist, but compliance with these guidelines varies. Therefore, we make recommendations for protecting and strengthening editorial independence.

psychiatry
A guide for social science journal editors on easing into open science

Priya Silverstein,Colin Elman,Amanda Montoya,Barbara McGillivray,Charlotte R Pennington,Chase H Harrison,Crystal N Steltenpohl,Jan Philipp Röer,Katherine S Corker,Lisa M Charron,Mahmoud Elsherif,Mario Malicki,Rachel Hayes-Harb,Sandra Grinschgl,Tess Neal,Thomas Rhys Evans,Veli-Matti Karhulahti,William L D Krenzer,Anabel Belaus,David Moreau,Debora I Burin,Elizabeth Chin,Esther Plomp,Evan Mayo-Wilson,Jared Lyle,Jonathan M Adler,Julia G Bottesini,Katherine M Lawson,Kathleen Schmidt,Kyrani Reneau,Lars Vilhuber,Ludo Waltman,Morton Ann Gernsbacher,Paul E Plonski,Sakshi Ghai,Sean Grant,Thu-Mai Christian,William Ngiam,Moin Syed

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-023-00141-5

2024-02-16

Abstract:Journal editors have a large amount of power to advance open science in their respective fields by incentivising and mandating open policies and practices at their journals. The Data PASS Journal Editors Discussion Interface (JEDI, an online community for social science journal editors: www.dpjedi.org ) has collated several resources on embedding open science in journal editing ( www.dpjedi.org/resources ). However, it can be overwhelming as an editor new to open science practices to know where to start. For this reason, we created a guide for journal editors on how to get started with open science. The guide outlines steps that editors can take to implement open policies and practices within their journal, and goes through the what, why, how, and worries of each policy and practice. This manuscript introduces and summarizes the guide (full guide: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/hstcx ).
Back Cover: The Future of Chemical Sciences is Sustainable

Sharon Mitchell,Antonio J. Martín,Gonzalo Guillén‐Gosálbez,Javier Pérez‐Ramírez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202409953

2024-06-08

Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Abstract:Chemistry is vital for society, but its practices must align with sustainable development. While attention often focuses on individual pillars—environment, economy, or equity—true sustainability requires alignment across all three. The cover image depicts a sustainability compass, symbolizing the integration of diverse principles into a unified set of triple E priorities proposed by Javier Pérez‐Ramírez et al. in their Scientific Perspective (e202318676) to guide efforts in the chemical sciences.

chemistry, multidisciplinary
Issue Cover (April 2024)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.13902

2024-03-17

Journal of Anatomy

Abstract:Front cover: Cover image: see M. Chiappone et al., 'Ostrich (Struthio camelus) syrinx morphology and vocal repertoire across postnatal ontogeny and sex: implications for understanding vocal evolution in birds', this issue.

anatomy & morphology
Why it's essential to study sex and gender, even as tensions rise

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-01207-0

IF: 64.8

2024-05-02

Nature

Abstract:Some scholars are reluctant to research sex and gender out of fear that their studies will be misused. In a series of specially commissioned articles, Nature encourages scientists to engage. Some scholars are reluctant to research sex and gender out of fear that their studies will be misused. In a series of specially commissioned articles, Nature encourages scientists to engage.

multidisciplinary sciences
Editors’ Overview: Topics in the Responsible Management of Research Data

Joe Giffels,Sara H. Vollmer,Stephanie J. Bird

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9243-1

IF: 3.777

2010-10-28

Science and Engineering Ethics

Abstract:Responsible data management is a multifaceted topic involving standards within the research community regarding research design and the sharing of data as well as the collection, selection, analysis and interpretation of data. Transparency in the manipulation of images is increasingly important in order to avoid misrepresentation of research findings, and research oversight is also critical in helping to assure the integrity of the research process. Intellectual property issues both unite and divide academe and industry in their approaches to data management. Central to the realization and promulgation of responsible data management is clear and careful communication of standards and expectations within the research community to trainees as well as among colleagues. These topics are examined and explored in depth in a special issue of Science and Engineering Ethics on responsible data management.

ethics,history & philosophy of science,multidisciplinary sciences,engineering, multidisciplinary
Musings on art and science

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-024-01266-x

2024-03-20

Nature Structural & Molecular Biology

Abstract:In addition to the usual dose of compelling science, our March issue features thoughtful reflections on the last 30 years from readers, as well as past and present editors. Perhaps influenced by these pieces or by our stunning cover — or maybe it is just the changing seasons — we are in an introspective mood this month.

cell biology,biochemistry & molecular biology,biophysics

What’s in a cover?

JAS Volume 41 Issue 2 Cover and Front Matter

Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature

In Science Journals

Three recommended inclusive language guidelines for scholarly publishing: Words matter

The changing roles of scientific journals

Opening Up of Editorial Activities at Chemistry Journals. What Does Editorship Mean and What Does It Involve?

Women in science : Materials

We need better and more PopSci by scientists

Can scientists and their institutions become their own open access publishers?

Scientific journals should be transformed into science storytellers to improve their visibility

Addressing Challenges to Public Understanding of Science: Epistemic Cognition, Motivated Reasoning, and Conceptual Change

Black women on the academic tightrope: four scholars weigh in

Protecting and promoting editorial independence

A guide for social science journal editors on easing into open science

Back Cover: The Future of Chemical Sciences is Sustainable

Issue Cover (April 2024)

Why it's essential to study sex and gender, even as tensions rise

Editors’ Overview: Topics in the Responsible Management of Research Data

Musings on art and science