Rethinking 'left-behind' places in a context of rising spatial inequalities and political discontent
Danny MacKinnon,Vincent Béal,Tim Leibert
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2291581
IF: 4.595
2024-01-18
Regional Studies
Abstract:JEL: Concern about spatial inequalities between regions has grown since the global financial crisis of 2008 (De Ruyter et al., Citation 2021 ; Martin et al., Citation 2022 ). In particular, growing spatial polarisation between the 'superstar' cities in which the knowledge economy is concentrated and 'left-behind' places has attracted attention from both researchers and policymakers (Bolton et al., Citation 2020 ; Hendrickson et al., Citation 2018 ; Martin et al., Citation 2021 ). Much of this interest has been sparked by the growth of political discontent and populism since the election of Donald Trump in the United States and the Brexit vote in the UK in 2016, based on popular resentment against political elites and institutions (Gordon, Citation 2018 ; Rodrik, Citation 2018 ). 'Left-behind' places are commonly portrayed as hotbeds of discontent, taking their revenge against established actors and norms by voting for antisystem parties and movements (Rodríguez-Pose, Citation 2018 ; Rodríguez-Pose et al., Citation 2023 ). This 'geography of discontent' (McCann, Citation 2020 ) is evident across a number of countries (Cagé & Piketty, Citation 2024 ; Dvořák & Zouhar, Citation 2023 ; McQuarrie, Citation 2017 ), although specific patterns of populist support vary considerably (Coquard, Citation 2019 ; de Lange et al., Citation 2023 ; Neel, Citation 2018 ).
economics,environmental studies,regional & urban planning,geography