Live Birth Rate after Fresh or Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfers in Relation to Maternal Age: a Retrospective Cochort Study of 13426 Cycles
X. Li,R. Huang,C. Fang,Y. Wang,X. Liang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.422
IF: 6.7
2016-01-01
Fertility and Sterility
Abstract:ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess live birth rate after fresh or frozen thawed embryo transfers in relation to maternal age for an individualized strategy for overall reproductive outcome.DesignA retrospective cochort study.Materials and MethodsAll patients undergoing fresh or frozen embryo transfers from 2010 to 2015 in our unit were enrolled. Individualized controlled ovarian hyper-stimulation protocols included long GnRH agonist, GnRH antagonist and minimal stimulation protocols. 5000-10,000 IU hCG (Ovidrel, Merck Serono) was utilized for follicular maturation and oocyte retrieval performed when appropriate. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection was adopted if the concentration of motile sperm was <1×106/mL, otherwise in vitro fertilization was used. Vitrification was performed for embryo freezing. The primary outcome was Live birth rate (LBR), defined as rate of deliveries that resulted in at least one live born baby per transfer. Chi-square and binary regression analysis were used for data analysis. A P39 years. Firstly, we found frozen cycles had higher LBR than that of fresh cycles (42.62% vs.38.81%, P<0.01). As expected, in blastocyst embryo transfer, LBR was significantly higher in frozen cycles in patients older than 30 years (56.02% vs.53.71%, P=0.106; 52.46%vs.42.93%, P<0.01; 38.11% vs. 29.27%, P<0.01; 19.38%vs.11.21%, P=0.01 for group1-4 respectively). Nevertheless, for cleavage-stage embryo, frozen cycles had lower LBR than that of fresh cycles in all age groups (37.41% vs.49.84%, P<0.05; 35.70% vs.44.58%, P <0.01; 23.75%vs.29.09%, P= 0.01; 8.70% vs.10.38%, P=0.17 for age group1-4 respectively), despite difference didn't reached statistical significance in those over 40 years. Further multivariate analysis confirmed the above results after adjusting covariates (such as age, number of embryo transferred, embryo quality, infertility etiologies etc.). Specifically, frozen blastocyst embryo transfers in cases over 40 years had more than twice chance getting live born baby than that of fresh cycles (adjusted OR 2.18,P=0.04). In term of miscarriage rate, no significant difference was observed between fresh and frozen cycles regardless of maternal age.ConclusionsIn every age-group, frozen cleavage-stage embryo transfers had lower LBR than that of fresh cleavage-stage embryo transfers, while frozen blastocyst transfers resulted in higher LBR than that of fresh cycles, showing blastocyst was the suitable stage for cryopreservation. Frozen blastocyst transfers obtained a comparatively stabile high LBR, especially in cases over 40 years. ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess live birth rate after fresh or frozen thawed embryo transfers in relation to maternal age for an individualized strategy for overall reproductive outcome. This study aimed to assess live birth rate after fresh or frozen thawed embryo transfers in relation to maternal age for an individualized strategy for overall reproductive outcome. DesignA retrospective cochort study. A retrospective cochort study. Materials and MethodsAll patients undergoing fresh or frozen embryo transfers from 2010 to 2015 in our unit were enrolled. Individualized controlled ovarian hyper-stimulation protocols included long GnRH agonist, GnRH antagonist and minimal stimulation protocols. 5000-10,000 IU hCG (Ovidrel, Merck Serono) was utilized for follicular maturation and oocyte retrieval performed when appropriate. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection was adopted if the concentration of motile sperm was <1×106/mL, otherwise in vitro fertilization was used. Vitrification was performed for embryo freezing. The primary outcome was Live birth rate (LBR), defined as rate of deliveries that resulted in at least one live born baby per transfer. Chi-square and binary regression analysis were used for data analysis. A P39 years. Firstly, we found frozen cycles had higher LBR than that of fresh cycles (42.62% vs.38.81%, P<0.01). As expected, in blastocyst embryo transfer, LBR was significantly higher in frozen cycles in patients older than 30 years (56.02% vs.53.71%, P=0.106; 52.46%vs.42.93%, P<0.01; 38.11% vs. 29.27%, P<0.01; 19.38%vs.11.21%, P=0.01 for group1-4 respectively). Nevertheless, for cleavage-stage embryo, frozen cycles had lower LBR than that of fresh cycles in all age groups (37.41% vs.49.84%, P<0.05; 35.70% vs.44.58%, P <0.01; 23.75%vs.29.09%, P= 0.01; 8.70% vs.10.38%, P=0.17 for age group1-4 respectively), despite difference didn't reached statistical significance in those over 40 years. Further multivariate analysis confirmed the above results after adjusting covariates (such as age, number of embryo transferred, embryo quality, infertility etiologies etc.). Specifically, frozen blastocyst embryo transfers in cases over 40 years had more than twice chance getting live born baby than that of fresh cycles (adjusted OR 2.18,P=0.04). In term of miscarriage rate, no significant difference was observed between fresh and frozen cycles regardless of maternal age. A total of 13426 cycles were assessed. We stratified patients into different age groups, i.e. <30 years, 30-34 years, 35-39 years and >39 years. Firstly, we found frozen cycles had higher LBR than that of fresh cycles (42.62% vs.38.81%, P<0.01). As expected, in blastocyst embryo transfer, LBR was significantly higher in frozen cycles in patients older than 30 years (56.02% vs.53.71%, P=0.106; 52.46%vs.42.93%, P<0.01; 38.11% vs. 29.27%, P<0.01; 19.38%vs.11.21%, P=0.01 for group1-4 respectively). Nevertheless, for cleavage-stage embryo, frozen cycles had lower LBR than that of fresh cycles in all age groups (37.41% vs.49.84%, P<0.05; 35.70% vs.44.58%, P <0.01; 23.75%vs.29.09%, P= 0.01; 8.70% vs.10.38%, P=0.17 for age group1-4 respectively), despite difference didn't reached statistical significance in those over 40 years. Further multivariate analysis confirmed the above results after adjusting covariates (such as age, number of embryo transferred, embryo quality, infertility etiologies etc.). Specifically, frozen blastocyst embryo transfers in cases over 40 years had more than twice chance getting live born baby than that of fresh cycles (adjusted OR 2.18,P=0.04). In term of miscarriage rate, no significant difference was observed between fresh and frozen cycles regardless of maternal age. ConclusionsIn every age-group, frozen cleavage-stage embryo transfers had lower LBR than that of fresh cleavage-stage embryo transfers, while frozen blastocyst transfers resulted in higher LBR than that of fresh cycles, showing blastocyst was the suitable stage for cryopreservation. Frozen blastocyst transfers obtained a comparatively stabile high LBR, especially in cases over 40 years. In every age-group, frozen cleavage-stage embryo transfers had lower LBR than that of fresh cleavage-stage embryo transfers, while frozen blastocyst transfers resulted in higher LBR than that of fresh cycles, showing blastocyst was the suitable stage for cryopreservation. Frozen blastocyst transfers obtained a comparatively stabile high LBR, especially in cases over 40 years.