Occurrence, spatial distribution, and risk assessment of brominated flame retardants in farmland soils of typical provinces in China
Mabinty Sarah Tholley,Lartey Young George,Mengru Fu,Zhihua Qiao,Gehui Wang,Siyuan Ling,Cheng Peng,Wei Zhang,Chunmei Ye,Fang Liu,Jie Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137356
IF: 8.8
2023-02-01
Chemosphere
Abstract:In the present study, we investigated the occurrence, distribution, and potential risks of 4 brominated flame retardants in farmland soils across 18 provinces of China. The total mean concentrations of the BFRs were in order as DBDPE > BDE209 > HBB > TBB. DBDPE concentration was highest at 177.208 ng/kg, revealing its long-term use and persistence across the study areas. In parts of China, DBDPE was highest in the south (Sichuan, Shaanxi and Guangdong provinces), BDE209 was highest in the south (Sichuan province) and north (Jilin province), while HBB was highest in the south (Sichuan province) and east (Anhui and Zhejiang provinces) of China. Comparisons of the results in this study to other reported studies in different regions indicated that the studied BFRs concentrations were higher in the studied provinces of China. Pearson correlation between BFRs revealed both positive and negative associations within the BFRs groups and between BFRs and soil properties (SOM, CEC, pH, EC and PS%). The mean hazard quotients (HQ) of ecological risks ranged from 8.76 × 10<sup>-6</sup> to 1.16 × 10<sup>-2</sup> (HQ < 1) while non-carcinogenic human health risk evaluation for adults ranged from 7.05 × 10<sup>-7</sup> - 7.48 × 10<sup>-4</sup> (HQ < 1) and for children 2.99 × 10<sup>-4</sup> - 4.30 × 10<sup>-2</sup> (HQ < 1). Although the risk evaluations of BFRs from farmland soils in this study were low, the results serve as useful indicators of potential cumulative and long-term threats of BFR to rural areas where there is a high conversion of agricultural lands to non-agricultural use.
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?