Severe Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Are There Significant Differences Between Hospitalized and Emergency Department Patients?

Mathieu Saint-Pierre

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/copd.s447477

2024-01-17

International Journal of COPD

Abstract:Mathieu D Saint-Pierre 1– 3 1 University of Ottawa, Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, ON, Canada; 2 Institut du Savoir Montfort, Ottawa, ON, Canada; 3 Montfort Hospital, Division of Respirology, Ottawa, ON, Canada Correspondence: Mathieu D Saint-Pierre, Montfort Hospital, 713 Montreal Road, Ottawa, ON, K1K 0T2, Canada, Email Rationale: Current guidelines define a severe acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) as an increase in symptoms requiring hospital admission or emergency department (ED) visit. Little is known about whether or not subjects requiring hospitalization and those needing only ED care have similar patient profiles and if their clinical outcomes appear comparable. Objective: The main goals of this study were to compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients treated for an AECOPD with an inpatient admission versus an ED visit and to review if hospital resource utilization was different between the 2 groups after discharge. Methods: Subjects treated in 2022 at Montfort Hospital for an AECOPD were reviewed. Patient demographic information was collected in addition to spirometry results and blood eosinophil counts on file. Supplemental oxygen use and medication lists were also recorded. Patients with an initial hospital admission were compared to those requiring only ED care with univariate and multivariate analyses. We also assessed if subjects were again treated for an AECOPD up to 6 months post initial discharge, and if so, the type of hospital visits (hospitalization or ED). Measurements and Main Results: A total of 135 individuals necessitated hospitalization and 79 received ED care for the treatment of an AECOPD. On univariate analysis, patients requiring an inpatient stay appeared older and were more likely to have spirometry results on file. A greater proportion of hospitalized individuals were on supplemental oxygen and prescribed at least one long-acting inhaled medication. These studied variables remained significant after multivariate logistic regression analysis. Subjects with an initial inpatient admission were also more likely to require hospitalization upon repeat presentation for a severe AECOPD. Conclusion: Given the important differences observed in both patient characteristics and hospital resource utilization, this study supports considering an AECOPD requiring inpatient admission versus an ED visit as distinct categories of events. Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, guidelines, severe acute exacerbation, hospitalization, emergency department Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) represents an important cause of both hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits. 1 In fact, AECOPD is the most prevalent cause of inpatient admission in Canada aside from childbirth, with recent data showing an upward trend in hospitalizations since 2010. 2,3 National spending for AECOPD requiring hospital care is at least 4 billion Canadian dollars per year. 4 Both the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) report and the Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS) guidelines define the severity of an AECOPD based on healthcare resource utilization, with a severe event considered as an increase in COPD symptoms beyond day-to-day variability and requiring hospital admission or ED visit. A moderate AECOPD is characterized as an episode treated in an outpatient setting with oral corticosteroids (OCS) and/or antibiotic, while a mild AECOPD necessitates only short-acting bronchodilator use. 5–7 Despite this apparent global consensus regarding the definition of a severe AECOPD, little is known about whether or not subjects requiring an inpatient admission and those only needing ED care have similar patient profiles and if their clinical outcomes appear comparable. Therefore, the primary objectives of this study were to assess in a real-world setting the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients treated for an AECOPD with hospitalization versus an ED visit and to review if hospital resource utilization was different between the 2 groups up to 6 months after the initial discharge. After local research ethics board (REB) approval (Montfort Hospital file #22-23-02-052), all individuals treated in 2022 for an AECOPD at Montfort Hospital (Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) were reviewed. Patient consent was not required by the REB as this was a retrospective study; data was anonymized and kept strictly confidential. All ethical principles set out in the Declaration of Helsinki were followed. Montfort Hospital is an academic teaching hospital affiliated with the University of Ottawa that provides acute care to approxi -Abstract Truncated-

respiratory system