Abstract:Although numerous paediatric-based health-related quality-of-life (HR-QOL) instruments are currently in use, there still remain conceptual, methodological and developmental issues to address. This paper provides an up-to-date critical review of the HR-QOL literature in paediatric medicine.Our analysis indicates that there is no consensus on how HR-QOL and overall QOL should be defined and measured in children. It is recommended that future studies focus on operationalising and distinguishing these constructs from each other and from traditional health-status measures. A clear empirical basis for generating instrument items and for prioritising specific domains must be described. Researchers should consider using the data gathered during their first interviews as a springboard from which to test their ideas of HR-QOL and QOL, reformulate concepts and subsequently retest their notions before developing instruments.Related to methodological challenges, consistency and agreement are still used interchangeably when comparing child and parent reports of children’s HR-QOL. The Pearson correlation is a measure of co-variation in scores, and not a measure of agreement. We recommend that researchers focus on determining agreement as opposed to consistency. Few, if any, attempts have been made to account for the possibility that a response shift may have occurred in the evaluation of HR-QOL. Most studies have compared HR-QOL scores of children with illness with their healthy peers. As such, there is a dearth of knowledge regarding the normative process of adaptation within the context of illness. It is recommended that researchers focus on gathering data using a relative standard of comparison. We further recommend that researchers interpret HR-QOL data in line with their intended purpose. Regarding developmental consideration, particular attention ought to be paid to developing instruments that consider children’s emerging sense of self, cognitive capacity and emotional awareness. Instruments that include items that are age appropriate are more likely to maximise reliability and validity of reports.The results of many HR-QOL instruments are applied in pharmacotherapeutic and pharmacoeconomic assessments. However, there has been relative infrequent application of economically valid HR-QOL tools (utility scales) and the use of HR-QOL scales as outcome measures in paediatric drug trials. As such, few cost-utility analyses have been performed to inform paediatric decision making. In addition, many of the concerns in the development of HR-QOL instruments should also be applied to the utility scales such that they reflect adequately children’s preferences for health states.

Comparing Generic Paediatric Health-Related Quality-of-Life Instruments: A Dimensionality Assessment Using Factor Analysis

Evaluating Health-Related Quality-of-Life Studies in Paediatric Populations

A psychometric investigation of health‐related quality of life measures for paediatric neurodevelopment assessment: Reliability and concurrent validity of the PEDS‐QL, CHU‐9D, and the EQ‐5D‐Y

A Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of the EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L Using Paediatric Multi-Instrument Comparison (P-MIC) Study Data

Generic preference‐based health‐related quality of life in children with neurodevelopmental disorders: a scoping review

Parent–child agreement across child health-related quality of life instruments: a review of the literature

Assessing Outcomes for Cost-Utility Analysis in Children and Adolescents With Mental Health Problems: Are Multiattribute Utility Instruments Fit for Purpose?

Development of a Health-State Classification System for the Pediatric Quality-of-Life Inventory Version 4.0 Generic Core Scales for Preference-Based Valuation in Australia

Child–Parent Agreement in the Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life Using the CHU9D and the PedsQLTM

The commonly used adult generic quality of life instruments for chronic diseases with merits and demerits

Psychometric Performance of HRQoL Measures: An Australian Paediatric Multi-Instrument Comparison Study Protocol (P-MIC)

Psychometric Comparison of EQ-5D-Y, CHU-9D, and PedsQL 4.0 in Chinese Children and Adolescents With Functional Dyspepsia: A Multicenter Study

A review of preference-based measures for the assessment of quality of life in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy

Psychometric Performance Comparison of the Adapted versus Original Versions of the EQ-5D-Y-3L and -Y-5L in Proxy Respondents for 2- to 4-Year-Olds

Health status and QOL instruments used in childhood cancer research: deciphering conceptual content using World Health Organization definitions

Psychometric Properties of Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D) Proxy Version Administered to Parents and Caregivers of Children Aged 2–4 Years Compared with Pediatric Quality of Life InventoryTM (PedsQL)

Pediatric health-related quality of life: a structural equation modeling approach

Comparison of the EQ-5D-Y and the CHU-9D instruments in a general child population based on self-reports and proxy-reports

Exploring the measurement of health related quality of life and broader instruments: A dimensionality analysis

An Investigation of Inter-Rater and Intra-Proxy Agreement in Measuring Quality of Life of Children in the Community Using the EQ-5D-Y-3L

Collecting Paediatric Health-Related Quality of Life Data: Assessing the Feasibility and Acceptability of the Australian Paediatric Multi-Instrument Comparison (P-MIC) Study