Use of Gait Profile Score and Gait Variable Score to Quantify Patient Improvement Immediately Following Neuro-Orthopedic Surgery in Patients with Cerebral Palsy – A Prospective Cohort Study.

G. Basini,D. Mazzoli,P. Prati,P. Zerbinati,M. Galletti,C. Rambelli,F. Mascioli,M.C. Bò,A. Merlo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.10.003
IF: 2.746
2024-10-08
Gait & Posture
Abstract:Background The Gait Profile Score (GPS) and the Gait Variable Score (GVS) are summary measures used to assess the long-term effects of neuro-orthopedic surgery (NOS) in children with cerebral palsy (cwCP). Research question What are the immediate changes after NOS as assessed by GPS and GVS, and how does GPS variation (ΔGPS) compare to the clinical opinion of the NOS outcome? Methods Prospective single-arm cohort study. CwCP were assessed before NOS and after the first month of weight-bearing. Popliteal angle, ankle passive dorsiflexion (pDF), and spasticity were collected at the bedside. During walking, pain was assessed using NPRS, and speed was obtained from gait analysis data, as well as GPS and GVS. Longitudinal variations were analyzed using the Wilcoxon test. Children were classified as Improved (I), Stable (S), or Worsened (W) according to ΔGPS and the cut-off threshold recommended in literature. Two clinicians independently classified patients either as I, S, or W based on surgical outcome. Agreement between these two classifications was analyzed using Cohen's k. Results Twenty cwCP, 11.4 (3.4) years, were included. At the follow-up: the popliteal angle was reduced by 20° (p=0.015); pDF increased by 10° (p<0.001), and triceps surae spasticity decreased (p=0.008). Pain decreased in four children. GPS decreased from 12.7 (range 8.1–27.7) to 11.8 (7.6–17.6) (ES=0.514, p=0.046), despite a decrease in gait speed (p<0.001). GVS better highlighted the effect of NOS after single-level surgery. Clinically, 18/1/1 children were classified I/S/W. Based on ΔGPS, 9/8/3 children were classified I/S/W. Such disagreement (k=0.119, p=0.227) was mainly due to the different focus of the two assessments. Significance Following NOS, immediate improvements in walking kinematics were observed.
neurosciences,orthopedics,sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?