Bidirectional Causal Association Between Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Cardiovascular Diseases: A Mendelian Randomization Study
Guangzan Yu,Lulu Liu,Qian Ma,Fusheng Han,Hua He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/copd.s475481
2024-09-26
International Journal of COPD
Abstract:Guangzan Yu, Lulu Liu, Qian Ma, Fusheng Han, Hua He Cardiac Division of Emergency Intensive Care Unit, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Hua He, Email Background: A large number of studies have demonstrated links between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). However, the causal relationship between COPD and CVDs and the reverse causality remains divergent. Methods: Exposure and outcome data from the largest available genome-wide association studies were extracted for Mendelian randomization (MR) studies. Univariate MR analysis was performed using IVW as the primary analysis method, and multiple sensitivity analyses were used to enhance the robustness of the results. Furthermore, this was followed by mediation MR analysis of positive results after excluding confounding factors with multivariable MR analysis. Results: The MR estimation based on IVW method indicated a strong association between genetically determined COPD and heart failure (HF) (OR = 1.117, 95% CI: 1.066– 1.170, p < 0.001), coronary heart disease (CHD) (OR = 1.004, 95% CI: 1.002– 1.006, p < 0.001), essential hypertension (EH) (OR = 1.009, 95% CI: 1.005– 1.013, p < 0.001) as well as Stroke (OR = 1.003, 95% CI: 1.001– 1.004, p 0.05). Our findings indicated that BMI, smoking initiation, smoking status, obesity, and FEV1 played a role in the causal effect of COPD on HF, EH, and Stroke. Conclusion: We found positive causal relationships between COPD and HF, EH, and Stroke essentially unaffected by other confounding factors. The causal relationship exhibited between COPD and CHD was influenced by confounding factors. BMI, obesity, initiation of smoking, smoking status, and FEV1 were the mediators between COPD and CVDs. Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular diseases, Mendelian randomization Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are two clinically frequent diseases with high morbidity and mortality in the elderly. There is no complete cure for COPD, and most people can only rely on medication and oxygen therapy to relieve symptoms and stop the progression of the disease. 1 Moreover, COPD patients have a high prevalence of CVDs, which makes treatment more difficult and the prognosis worse. So, the best solution is to prevent the disease from occurring. Both conditions share numerous risk factors in common, including smoking and age. 2 Clinical observations indicate a frequent co-occurrence of these diseases within the same patient population.Although COPD is a lung disease, patients often die from cardiovascular disease or cancer. If patients with COPD take steps to prevent the onset of these common CVDs such as heart failure (HF), coronary heart disease (CHD), essential hypertension (EH), atrial fibrillation (AF), and Stroke, or if patients with existing CVDs take steps to prevent the onset of COPD disease, the rate of disability and death from the disease can be greatly reduced. 3,4 There has been a great deal of investigation showing that COPD has a positive causal relationship with CVDs, and that patients with COPD have a greater likelihood of having a disease associated with CVDs. However, there is still disagreement about the causal relationship between COPD and specific CVDs and whether cardiovascular disease causes an increase in the prevalence of COPD patients. 5 Mendelian randomization studies can avoid confounding factors and reverse causation and are suitable for application to the study of complex causal relationships between these two types of diseases. Mendelian randomization studies are an approach that uses genetic variation, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), as instrumental variables to study causal relationships between risk factors and outcomes. 6 Because the two alleles on a chromosome are randomly assigned during meiosis, they are not subject to external confounding factors and essentially show whether the risk factor is causally related to the disease. Mendelian randomization studies are weaker than randomized controlled trials (RCT) and stronger than observational studies in terms of level of evidence. But they are easier to conduct than RCT, and more economical on financial resources and time. 7 In this study, we first executed a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study to determine the causal relationship between COPD and CVDs. The multivariate Mendelian randomization (MVMR) study of CVDs -Abstract Truncated-
respiratory system