Abstract:Despite the importance of population structures throughout ecology, relatively little theoretical attention has been paid to understanding the implications of social groups for population dynamics. The dynamics of socially structured populations differ substantially from those of unstructured or metapopulation‐structured populations, because social groups themselves may split, fuse, and compete. These "between‐group processes" remain understudied as drivers of the dynamics of socially structured populations. Here, we explore the role of various between‐group processes in the dynamics of socially structured populations. To do so, we analyze a model that includes births, deaths, migration, fissions, fusions, and between‐group competition and flexibly allows for density dependence in each process. Both logistic growth and an Allee effect are considered for within‐group density dependence. We show that the effect of various between‐group processes is mediated by their influence on the stable distribution of group sizes, with the ultimate impact on the population determined by the interaction between within‐group density dependence and the process's effect on the group size distribution. Between‐group interactions that change the number of groups can lead to both negative and positive density dependence at the global population level (even if birth and death rates depend only on group size and not population size). We conclude with a series of case studies that illustrates different ways that age, sex, and class structure impact the dynamics of social populations. These case studies demonstrate the importance of group‐formation mechanisms, the cost of having excess males in a group, and the potential drawbacks of generating too many reproductive individuals. In sum, our results make clear the importance of within‐group density dependence, between‐group dynamics, and the interactions between them for the population dynamics of social species and provide a flexible framework for modeling social populations.

The concept of critical age group for density dependence: bridging the gap between demographers, evolutionary biologists and behavioural ecologists

A flexible theory for the dynamics of social populations: Within‐group density dependence and between‐group processes

How population control of pests is modulated by density dependence: The perspective of genetic biocontrol

Integrative developmental ecology: a review of density-dependent effects on life-history traits and host-microbe interactions in non-social holometabolous insects

Density-dependent feedback in age-structured populations

The ecology of ageing in wild societies: linking age structure and social behaviour

Understanding age and society using natural populations

Population age structure shapes selection on social behaviour in a long-lived insect

Density Dependence Shapes Life‐History Trade‐Offs in a Food‐Limited Population

Weak signals, strong debates: Density dependence and population regulation through the lens of model uncertainty

Author Response for "density Dependence Shapes Life‐History Trade‐Offs in a Food‐Limited Population"

Age-dependent shaping of the social environment in a long-lived seabird: a quantitative genetic approach

Density dependence shapes life-history trade-offs in a food limited ungulate population

The importance of population growth and regulation in human life history evolution

Effects of life history and individual development on community dynamics: A review of counterintuitive consequences

Using ecology to inform physiology studies: implications of high population density in the laboratory

When individual life history matters: conditions for juvenile-adult stage structure effects on population dynamics

Phenotypic evolution in stochastic environments: The contribution of frequency‐ and density‐dependent selection

Consequences of Local Conspecific Density Effects for Plant Diversity and Community Dynamics

Trade-offs beget trade-offs: Causal analysis of mammalian population dynamics

The adaptive value of density-dependent habitat specialization and social network centrality