Health Consequences of the Chornobyl Accident
Dillwyn Williams
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.292.5524.2010
IF: 56.9
2001-06-15
Science
Abstract:The news focus article “Living in the shadow of Chornobyl” by Richard Stone (20 Apr., p. [420][1]) serves to remind us that the health consequences of an accident that took place 15 years ago are still occurring. In the article, however, Stone reports that the incidence of thyroid cancer in children rose as early as 1 year after the accident. My colleagues and I were the first to draw the attention of the West to the rise in thyroid cancer, after a visit to Minsk in 1992 ([1][2]), and we continue to work on the incidence, pathology, and molecular biology of the increase.
The first significant rise in thyroid cancer occurred in 1990, 4 years after the accident in 1986; there was a possible rise in 1989, but only natural variation in the previous years. I do not believe that there was a rise 1 year after the accident, because of the time needed for the acquisition of further mutations after the original exposure, and the time needed for growth of the tumor to a detectable size. The combination of these factors with the growth pattern of the thyroid gland, diminishing during childhood to reach very slow growth levels in adult life, accounts for the sensitivity of very young children to this cancer ([2][3]).
Although Stone says that the risk of health problems in the exposed population is a subject of intense scrutiny, the major international effort has been devoted to thyroid problems. It is not surprising that these were dominant in the early stages, because radioiodines (together with tellurium-132, which decays to iodine-132) formed the greatest proportion of the activity released, excluding the biologically inert xenon. However, it is important to have a coordinated international effort to investigate all the possible consequences. It is particularly important to create a balance sheet of the health risks of conventional and nuclear power generation at a time when the United States is reportedly considering new nuclear power stations. The health risks could then be considered along with the other effects, such as the contribution to global warming. But without full information on Chornobyl, we cannot make a fully informed decision.
1. [↵][4]1. V. S. Kazakov, 2. E. P. Demidchik, 3. I. N. Astakhova
, Nature 359, 21 (1992);
1. K. Baverstock, 2. B. Egloff, 3. A. Pinchera, 4. C. Ruchti, 5. D. Williams
, Nature 359, 21 (1992).
2. [↵][5]1. G. A. Thomas 2. et al.
1. E. D. Williams
, in Radiation and Thyroid Cancer, G. A. Thomas et al., Ed. (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 1999), pp. 177-188.
# Response {#article-title-2}
Regarding the lag time in observed thyroid cancer cases, Williams is correct: The sentence at issue should have read “…the number of childhood thyroid cancer cases began rising within a few years after the accident.” My remark that health effects in the exposed population have been subject to intense scrutiny is based in part on efforts by researchers in several countries to reconstruct doses and trace Chornobyl-related health effects of the liquidators (clean-up workers). These studies are alluded to but not discussed in detail in my article. Belarusan, Russian, and Ukrainian scientists have also gathered health data that should provide grist for international studies.
[1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.292.5516.420
[2]: #ref-1
[3]: #ref-2
[4]: #xref-ref-1-1 "View reference 1 in text"
[5]: #xref-ref-2-1 "View reference 2 in text"