The Mutation Matters: CSF Profiles of GCase , Sphingolipids, α‐Synuclein in PD GBA

Stefanie Lerche,Claudia Schulte,Isabel Wurster,Gerrit Machetanz,Benjamin Roeben,Milan Zimmermann,Christian Deuschle,Ann‐Kathrin Hauser,Judith Böhringer,Ingeborg Krägeloh‐Mann,Katharina Waniek,Ingolf Lachmann,Xuan‐Mai T. Petterson,Ruby Chiang,Hyejung Park,Bing Wang,Inga Liepelt‐Scarfone,Walter Maetzler,Douglas Galasko,Clemens R. Scherzer,Thomas Gasser,Michelle M. Mielke,Samantha J. Hutten,Brit Mollenhauer,S. Pablo Sardi,Daniela Berg,Kathrin Brockmann
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.28472
IF: 9.698
2021-02-06
Movement Disorders
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background</h3><p>With pathway‐specific trials in PD associated with variants in the glucocerebrosidase gene (PD<sub>GBA</sub>) under way, we need markers that confirm the impact of genetic variants in patient‐derived biofluids in order to allow patient stratification merely based on genetics and that might serve as biochemical read‐out for target engagement. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Objective</h3><p>To explore GBA‐pathway‐specific biomarker profiles cross‐sectionally (TUEPAC‐MIGAP, PPMI) and longitudinally (PPMI).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>We measured enzyme activity of the lysosomal glucocerebrosidase, CSF levels of glucosylceramides (upstream substrate of glucocerebrosidase), CSF levels of ceramides (downstream product of glucocerebrosidase), lactosylceramides, sphingosines, sphingomyelin (by‐products) and CSF levels of total α‐synuclein in PD<sub>GBA</sub> patients compared to PD<sub>GBA_wildtype</sub> patients. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>Cross‐sectionally in both cohorts and longitudinally in PPMI: (1) glucocerebrosidase activity was significantly lower in PD<sub>GBA</sub> compared to PD<sub>GBA_wildtype</sub>. (2) CSF levels of upstream substrates (glucosylceramides species) were higher in PD<sub>GBA</sub> compared to PD<sub>GBA_wildtype</sub>. (3) CSF levels of total α‐synuclein were lower in PD<sub>GBA</sub> compared to PD<sub>GBA_wildtype</sub>. All of these findings were most pronounced in PD<sub>GBA</sub> with severe mutations (PD<sub>GBA_severe</sub>). Cross‐sectionally in TUEPAC‐MIGAP and longitudinally in PPMI, CSF levels of downstream‐products (ceramides) were higher in PD<sub>GBA_severe</sub>. Cross‐sectionally in TUEPAC‐MIGAP by‐products sphinganine and sphingosine‐1‐phosphate and longitudinally in PPMI species of by‐products lactosylceramides and sphingomyelin were higher in PD<sub>GBA_severe</sub>. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Interpretation</h3><p>These findings confirm that GBA mutations have a relevant functional impact on biomarker profiles in patients. Bridging the gap between genetics and biochemical profiles now allows patient stratification for clinical trials merely based on mutation status. Importantly, all findings were most prominent in PD<sub>GBA</sub> with severe variants. © 2021 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society </p></section>
clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?