Absence of Aerosol Indirect Effect Dependence on Background Climate State in NCAR CESM2

Kayla White,Dunyu Liu,Geeta Persad
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-23-0755.1
IF: 5.38
2024-09-25
Journal of Climate
Abstract:The aerosol indirect effect (AIE) dominates uncertainty in total anthropogenic aerosol forcing in CMIP6 models. AIE strength depends on meteorological conditions that have been shown to change between pre-industrial (PI) and present-day (PD) climates, such as cloud cover and atmospheric moisture. Hence, AIE strength may depend on background climate state, impacting the dependence of model-based AIE estimates on experiment design or the evolution of AIE strength with intensifying climate change, which has not previously been explicitly evaluated. Using atmosphere-only simulations with prescribed observed sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and sea ice in the NCAR CESM2 CAM6 model, we impose a PD (2000) aerosol perturbation onto a PI (1850), PD, and PD with a uniform 4K increase in SST (PD+4K) background climate to assess the dependence of the total aerosol effective radiative forcing (ERF) and AIE on background climate. We find statistically insignificant increases in aerosol ERF when estimated in the different background climates, almost entirely from increases in direct ERF, but with some regionally significant compensating signals in PD+4K. The absence of an AIE dependence on background climate in our PD simulation may be tied to documented differences in cloud responses to the observed SSTs used in our simulations vs. to SSTs produced by the fully-coupled models from which most cloud feedback studies are derived, known as the "pattern effect". Our findings indicate that AIE and aerosol forcing overall may not have a strong dependence on background climate state in the near future but could regionally under extreme climate change.
meteorology & atmospheric sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?