Abstract:Negative carbon dioxide (CO 2 )-emissions are prevalent in most global emissions pathways that meet the Paris temperature targets and are a critical component for reaching net-zero emissions in Year 2050. However, economic incentives supporting commercialization and deployment of BioEnergy Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) are missing. This Policy and Practice Review discusses five different models for creating incentives and financing for BECCS, using Sweden as an example: (1) governmental guarantees for purchasing BECCS outcomes; (2) quota obligation on selected sectors to acquire BECCS outcomes; (3) allowing BECCS credits to compensate for hard-to-abate emissions within the EU ETS; (4) private entities for voluntary compensation; and (5) other states acting as buyers of BECCS outcomes to meet their mitigation targets under the Paris Agreement. We conclude that successful implementation of BECCS is likely to require a combination of several of the Policy Models, implemented in a sequential manner. The governmental guarantee model (Model 1) is likely to be required in the shorter term, so as to establish BECCS. Policy Models 2 and 3 may become more influential over time once BECCS has been established and accepted. Model 3 links BECCS to a large carbon-pricing regime with opportunities for cost-effectiveness and expanded financing. We conclude that Policy Models 4 and 5 are associated with high levels of uncertainty regarding the timing and volume of negative emissions that can be expected—Thus, they are unlikely to trigger BECCS implementation in the short term, although may have roles in the longer term. Based on this study, we recommend that policymakers carefully consider a policy sequencing approach that is predictable and sustainable over time, for which further analyses are required. It is not obvious how such sequencing can be arranged, as the capacities to implement the different Policy Models are vested in different organizations (national governments, EU, private firms). Furthermore, it is important that a BECCS policy is part of an integrated climate policy framework, in particular one that is in line with policies aimed at the mitigation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the creation of a circular economy. It will be important to ensure that BECCS and the associated biomass resource are not overexploited. A well-designed policy package should guarantee that BECCS is neither used to postpone the reduction of fossil fuel-based emissions nor overused in the short term as a niche business for “greenwashing” while not addressing fossil fuel emissions.

Categorization, identification, and analysis of barriers to market growth in biogas solutions – The case of Sweden

Policy risks in the biogas sector – the case of Sweden

Biogas policies and production development in Europe: a comparative analysis of eight countries

Actor's perspectives on barriers to the use of sewage sludge in Sweden

Effects of the Covid-19 pandemic on the Swedish Biogas Sector

Unlocking European biogas and biomethane: Policy insights from comparative analysis

Assessment of the barriers of natural gas market development and implementation: A case of developing country

Centralized or decentralized? How to exploit Sweden's agricultural biomethane potential

Unravelling barriers associated with dissemination of large-scale biogas plant with analytical hierarchical process and fuzzy analytical hierarchical process approach: Case study of India

Farmers' motivations to cultivate biomass for energy and implications

Exploring green logistics practices in freight transport and logistics: a study of biomethane use in Sweden

Household Food Waste to Biogas in Västerås, Sweden: A Comprehensive Case Study of Waste Valorization

Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of hydrogen production from biowaste and biomass in Sweden

Second generation biofuels and the competition for forest raw materials: A partial equilibrium analysis of Sweden

Incentivizing BECCS—A Swedish Case Study

Lignocellulosic Ethanol in a Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Obligation System—A Case Study of Swedish Sawdust Based-Ethanol Production

Qualitative Stakeholder Analysis for a Swedish Regional Biogas Development: A Thematic Network Approach

Circular Bioeconomy in the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona: Policy Recommendations to Optimize Biowaste Management

Innovation policies for advanced biorefinery development: key considerations and lessons from Sweden

Cost-optimal CO 2 capture and transport infrastructure—A case study of Sweden

Fuelling the future: Assessing multifuel filling stations for hydrogen and other renewable fuels through life cycle analysis