Abstract:Business groups have played a vital role in the development of emerging markets. However, we share very limited understanding in the role of business group that act on affiliated firms’ CSR performance. Using manually sorted data on A-share listed companies and business groups in China from 2010–2017, we examine whether a company’s business group-affiliation affects its corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance and the mediating mechanisms of this association. Our empirical models show that group companies bear a higher level of social responsibility compared to independent companies. This positive relationship between group-affiliation and social responsibility relies on resource allocation through internal capital markets, rent-seeking initiatives, and consideration of corporate reputation. Moreover, group affiliation benefits the firm’s CSR performance in employee’s responsibilities, consumers’ responsibilities and environmental responsibilities, while significantly lower the shareholders’ responsibilities. Our empirical valuation of group companies’ CSR levels can serve as a benchmark for emerging market companies implementing social responsibility policies.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What Problem Does This Paper Attempt to Solve? This paper aims to explore the impact of business groups on the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) performance of their member companies and the underlying mechanisms. Specifically, the study addresses this issue through the following aspects: 1. **The Relationship Between Business Groups and CSR Performance**: - The study hypothesizes that the CSR performance of member companies in business groups is better than that of independent companies. - This hypothesis is based on the premise that business groups can allocate resources through internal capital markets, seek rents, and consider corporate reputation. 2. **Mechanism Analysis**: - **Internal Capital Market Resource Allocation Mechanism**: The study posits that business groups can enhance the CSR performance of their member companies through the resource allocation mechanism of internal capital markets. - **Rent-Seeking Motivation Mechanism**: Due to their larger scale and diversified operations, business groups have stronger rent-seeking motivations, which compel member companies to undertake higher social responsibilities. - **Corporate Reputation Mechanism**: Business groups need to undertake higher social responsibilities to maintain and enhance corporate reputation. 3. **Differences in CSR Performance Across Different Dimensions**: - Member companies of business groups perform better than independent companies in non-economic responsibilities (such as employee responsibility, consumer responsibility, and environmental responsibility), but perform worse in economic responsibilities. ### Main Hypotheses 1. **H1**: The CSR performance of member companies in business groups is better than that of independent companies. 2. **H2**: Business groups promote CSR performance through the internal capital market resource allocation mechanism. 3. **H3**: Business groups promote CSR performance through the rent-seeking motivation mechanism. 4. **H4**: Business groups promote CSR performance through the corporate reputation mechanism. 5. **H5**: Compared to independent companies, member companies of business groups perform better in non-economic responsibilities but worse in economic responsibilities. ### Data Sources and Research Design - **Sample Selection**: The study selected A-share companies listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange and Shanghai Stock Exchange in China from 2010 to 2017 as the sample. - **Variable Selection**: The study used Hexun's CSR scores and the social contribution value per share as indicators to measure CSR, and defined the affiliation of business groups. - **Model Design**: The study constructed regression models to test the impact of business groups on CSR and validated the effectiveness of the internal capital market resource allocation, rent-seeking, and corporate reputation mechanisms. ### Conclusion Through empirical research, the paper attempts to reveal the role of business groups in the CSR performance of their member companies and the underlying mechanisms, providing theoretical support for corporate and social sustainable development.

Business Group-Affiliation and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Listed Companies in China

Business Groups and the Value of Affiliated Companies

Business groups and environmental violations: Evidence from China

Corporate Social Responsibility, Analyst Focus and Firm Performance

Executives with financial backgrounds and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China

Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

Firm performance, corporate ownership, and corporate social responsibility disclosure in China

Business Group Performance in China: Ownership and Temporal Considerations

Corporate social responsibility, internal control, and firm financial performance

Influence Mechanism between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Sustainability: Empirical Evidence from China

Corporate Social Responsibility in Market Liberalization: Evidence from Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect

Extension and Integrity of Business Groups: Evidence from China

Does a Company's Position within the Interlocking Director Network Influence Its ESG Performance?—Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Do participants in the bond market care about corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China

Beyond Market Strategies: How Multiple Decision-Maker Groups Jointly Influence Underperforming Firms’ Corporate Social (Ir)responsibility

Socially Responsible Leaders Driving Firm Performance:Evidence from Leading Chinese Companies

Corporate social responsibility and financial statement comparability: Evidence from China

Executives' academic experience and corporate social responsibility: A case study in China

Mixed-Ownership Reform and Private Firms’ Corporate Social Responsibility Practices: Evidence From China

Does CSR affect the cost of equity capital: Empirical evidence from the targeted poverty alleviation of listed companies in China

Corporate social responsibility, media attention and firm value: empirical research on Chinese manufacturing firms