Abstract:INTRODUCTION Over the past 30 years, initiatives have been taken throughout the world to seek alternatives to traditional methods for the provision of public services. PPPs, an important tool for government reform, have been increasingly implemented since the 1980s (Gibelman and Demone 1983) and have become popular institutional arrangements for supplementing or replacing traditional supply models of public services. At present, the definition of PPPs remains ambiguous. Some define PPPs in a narrow sense as private investment in public infrastructure, and this has become the focus of most existing research. Others consider PPPs to be a middle way between state and privatization (Leitch and Motion 2003). Savas broadly defined PPPs as any relationship between the public and private sectors, or any arrangement under which the private sector takes up actions traditionally performed by the public sector (Savas 2002: 105). His definition covers almost everything with public and private features, including such arrangements as contract system and joint operation. This paper utilizes a broad definition: PPPs are agreements between the public and non-public sectors, in which the non-public sector participates in public service decision-making, directly or indirectly provides services, and shares risks with the public sector. (1) The division of public service delivery subjects into providers and producers can be traced back to the late 1950s (Musgrave 1959). Later, the multiple service provision model was put forward (Savas 2002: 69). The service provision under administrative orders model was gradually replaced by the provision through market allocation based on competitive contracts model. As a result, the relationship between the public and private sectors was reconstructed. The multiple service provision model required cross-sector partnerships and collaboration and targeted integration between the public and non-public sectors. PPPs then emerged as institutional arrangements to address these issues (Jamali 2004). The strengths of PPPs include reduced input cost, improved operational efficiency, better service quality, risk sharing, and maximum use of existing resources and competition. As an innovative path for public service provision, PPPs can bring about more new resources and competition (Domberger and Jensen 1997, Pongsiri 2002, Bovaird 2004). In PPPs, government is increasingly dependent on the external environment to fulfill its mission of providing public services. Most of this work must be completed by coordinating complex inter-actor relationships. The majority of government employees are not in direct contact with personnel responsible for public service provision. The traditional approach of acting alone features limited impact, but the expertise of the public and non-public sectors can complement and balance each other (Linder 1999). Besides, increased efficiency of individual organizations is not equal to the improved overall service of PPPs (Provan and Milward 1995). This may be due to the other organizations' reduced efficiency, or to the poor coordination of different organizations. Government no longer relies solely on traditional hierarchical authority or itself to provide public services (Rhodes 1996), but more on a variety of collaborations and partnerships to establish a network to achieve the goal of public service provision. It's the establishment of reasonable partnerships that can guarantee the strengths and successes of PPPs. Although Savas included various forms of PPPs in the multiple institutional arrangements for public service provision (Savas 2002: 69-91), he failed to analyze in depth how PPPs should be established. Cooper managed to deepen his research into the quality level in contract management (Cooper 2007: 5), but he ignored that excessive reliance on regulatory management and control, such as special inspection and regulations, might cause confrontations between subjects in the collaborative network, for in this case the principal aimed to find errors, but not to improve partnerships (Goldsmith and Eggers 2004: 106). …

DELIVERING CARE SERVICES TO THE ELDERLY POPULATION USING PUBLICPRIVATE PARTNERSHIP

A Budget Proposal for China’s Public Long-Term Care Policy

Public-Private Partnership: An Effective Solution for Providing Health Services to the Elderly

THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP - A BENEFIT OR A CHALLENGE FOR THE MACEDONIAN PUBLIC HEALTHCARE SYSTEM

Public-private partnership in care provision for ageing-in-place: A comparative study in Guangdong, China

Research of Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) Model in Elderly Care Service in the Accelerated Rate of Aging in China

Investigating the potential in adopting a “Design – for – All” asset based developed, Integrated Long-Term Care Innovative Financing Model, in countries facing budget cuts in social care.

Public-private partnership in health and long-term care : the Hong Kong experience

Current Situation of Public Private Partnership Development for the Elderly in China

PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP IN THE FIELD OF HEALTH CARE

PPP: New Ways of Financing for Elderly Care Industry Amid Supply-Side Reform

POLICIES FOR PRESERVING THE WORK ACTIVITY OF PEOPLE IN RETIREMENT AGE IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS IN BULGARIA

JAVNO-PRIVATNO PARTNERSTVO U SEKTORU ZDRAVSTVENIH USLUGA U FEDERACIJI BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE I MOGUĆNOSTI INVESTIRANJA U BOSNU I HERCEGOVINU / PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP IN THE HEALTH SERVICE SECTOR IN FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA AND INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

Why do Local Governments Externalise Public Service Delivery? An Empirical Analysis of the Drivers of Corporatisation, Public-public Collaboration and PPP in the Flemish Elderly Care Sector

Action Research Investigating the potential in adhering to the development and design of a new model for LTC based on innovative financing, in the context of countries facing budget cuts in social care.

Public-private partnership in the healthcare system of Khabarovsk Krai

THE TRAINING AND EDUCATION OF AGE PEOPLE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR ACTIVE LIFE OF ADULTS PEOPLE IN BULGARIA - RESEARCH

Using public-private partnerships to improve the efficiency of housing and communal services

PPPs: Inter-Actor Relationships Two Cases of Home-Based Care Services in China

Conceptualization of long term care policies for the elderly population: Analysis of Serbia's (in)compliance with the characteristics of the policies in the European Union

Institutionalization of long-term care for the elderly: the experience of St. Petersburg