Inflammatory response to bioceramic and epoxy resin‐based endodontic sealers implanted in mice subcutaneous tissue: An in vivo study

Vanessa Valente Elias,Ricardo Barbosa Lima,Marília Pacífico Lucisano,Lisa Danielly Curcino Araujo,Carolina Maschietto Pucinelli,Paulo Nelson‐Filho,Raquel Assed Bezerra da Silva,Léa Assed Bezerra da Silva
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.24631
2024-06-11
Microscopy Research and Technique
Abstract:This study demonstrated that AH Plus Jet triggered a milder inflammatory tissue response than BioRootTM RCS (BR) when implanted into the mice subcutaneous tissue after 7 and 21 days, but not after 63 days. Furthermore, only BR triggered the precipitation of calcium compounds in the reactionary tissue. To evaluate the inflammatory tissue response to BioRootTM RCS (BR) and AH Plus Jet (AHPJ) sealers implanted in mice subcutaneous tissue. It was hypothesized that the inflammatory tissue response to BR would be milder than to AHPJ. An in vivo study was carried out using isogenic mice. The sealers were implanted during standardized surgical procedures. The inflammatory response was evaluated by microscopic analysis and von Kossa reaction in the reactionary tissue around the specimens after 7, 21, and 63 days. For comparisons, a zinc oxide and eugenol sealer (ZOE) was used as a positive control, in addition to a negative control without a sealer (n = 10 per group/period). All statistical analyses considered a significance level of 5%. All endodontic sealers triggered an inflammatory tissue response after 7 days. BR had a higher inflammatory cell count and a thicker fibrous capsule when compared with AHPJ, but both were less inflammatory than ZOE (p
biology,microscopy,anatomy & morphology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?