Life cycle and techno-economic assessment of bioresource production from wastewater

Kevin Clack,Deepak Rajagopal,Eric M.V. Hoek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-024-00314-9

IF: 11.4

2024-03-22

npj Clean Water

Abstract:Thermochemical conversion technologies present an opportunity to flip the paradigm of wastewater biosolids management operations from energy-intense and expensive waste management processes into energy-positive and economical resource extraction centers. Herein, we present a uniform "grading framework" to consistently evaluate the environmental and commercial benefits of established and emerging wastewater biosolids management processes from a life cycle and techno-economic perspective. Application of this approach reveals that established wastewater biosolids management practices such as landfilling, land application, incineration, and anaerobic digestion, while commercially viable, offer little environmental benefit. On the other hand, emerging thermochemical bioresource recovery technologies such as hydrothermal liquefaction, gasification, pyrolysis, and torrefaction show potential to provide substantial economic and environmental benefit through the recovery of carbon and nutrients from wastewater biosolids in the form of biofuels, fertilizers, and other high-value products. Some emerging thermochemical technologies have developed beyond pilot scale although their commercial viability remains to be seen.

engineering, chemical,environmental sciences,water resources

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to transform from an energy - intensive and costly waste management process to an energy - positive and economical resource extraction center through improving wastewater biosolids management operations. Specifically, the paper proposes a unified "hierarchical framework" for consistently evaluating the environmental and commercial benefits of existing and emerging wastewater biosolids management processes from the perspectives of life cycle and techno - economic evaluation.

### Main Problems in the Paper
1. **Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions**:
- Wastewater treatment accounts for approximately 3% of the total electricity consumption in the United States and about 3% of the total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the United States. Therefore, recovering energy and renewable alternatives from biosolids can significantly affect the energy requirements, carbon footprint, and economic performance of municipal wastewater treatment facilities.

2. **Limitations of Existing Management Methods**:
- Existing wastewater biosolids management methods such as landfilling, land application, incineration, and anaerobic digestion, although commercially viable, offer limited environmental benefits. These methods still result in significant energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, economic burdens, and the release of valuable carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus compounds into the environment as pollutants.

3. **Potential of Emerging Technologies**:
- Emerging thermochemical bioresource recovery technologies such as hydrothermal liquefaction, gasification, pyrolysis, and heat treatment show the potential to provide significant economic and environmental benefits by recovering carbon and nutrients (in the form of biofuels, fertilizers, and other high - value products) from wastewater biosolids.

### Solutions
The paper addresses the above problems through the following methods:

1. **Unified Hierarchical Framework**:
- Propose a unified "hierarchical framework" to evaluate the environmental and commercial benefits of different wastewater biosolids management methods. This framework takes into account factors such as residues from final disposal, energy balance, CO₂e emissions, capital expenditure (CAPEX), net operating profit (NOP), and technology readiness level (TRL).

2. **Life - Cycle and Techno - economic Assessment (LCA and TEA)**:
- Use life - cycle assessment (LCA) and techno - economic assessment (TEA) to comprehensively evaluate the environmental impacts and economic performance of various technologies. LCA assesses the environmental impacts throughout the life cycle, while TEA assesses the technological and economic feasibility.

3. **Comprehensive Analysis**:
- Conduct a comprehensive analysis of 10 peer - reviewed LCAs and TEAs, integrate their results into a unified system boundary, and evaluate the environmental and commercial benefits of 35 bioresource recovery process options.

### Conclusions
The study found that emerging thermochemical processes such as hydrothermal liquefaction, pyrolysis, and gasification may offer more economic and environmental benefits than traditional management methods. In particular, when considering carbon credit sales, some emerging technologies such as HTL - CAS_FP and FD - Torr_BSF can achieve a positive net present value (NPV), showing significant economic and environmental advantages.

### Future Recommendations
- **Technological Innovation**: Continue to research, develop, and optimize emerging technologies to reduce capital expenditure (CAPEX) and operating costs (OPEX) and increase net operating profit (NOP).
- **Policy Support**: The government should provide subsidies and tax incentives to encourage the adoption of emerging technologies.
- **Commercialization Promotion**: Promote the commercial application of emerging technologies, especially in municipal environments with limited resources.

Through these methods, the paper aims to promote the development of wastewater biosolids management in a more sustainable and cost - effective direction.