Benchmarking pre-clinical heart failure with preserved ejection fraction models: can we do better?

David A Kass
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvae059
IF: 13.081
2024-04-05
Cardiovascular Research
Abstract:Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (EF) (HFpEF) affects about half the estimated 64 million HF patients worldwide, and its prevalence is increasing. 1 Patients have exertional fatigue and breathlessness, often with excess fluid volume, and a non-dilated left ventricle with an EF ≥ 50%. Cardiovascular abnormalities may or may not be evident at rest but can be unmasked by stress test haemodynamics. 1 Historically, HFpEF prominently featured hypertension, ventricular hypertrophy, myocardial fibrosis, and abnormal cardiac diastolic properties such as delayed relaxation and chamber stiffening. Pre-clinical models generated these abnormalities by subjecting rats or mice to sustained pressure overload, salt/volume loading, and/or neurohormonal activation. In the meantime, clinical HFpEF was being transformed by the growing prominence of obesity and metabolic syndrome as primary comorbidities. This has changed the syndrome clinically, functionally, and at very basic molecular and cellular levels. 2–4 Accordingly, pre-clinical models also changed by adding obesity to haemodynamic/hormonal stressors in combinations often colloquially referred to as '2-hits' or, if aging is added, '3-hits'. 5
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: how to better establish and evaluate pre - clinical models for the study of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) to ensure that these models can more accurately reflect the pathophysiological characteristics of human HFpEF. Specifically, the author points out that current pre - clinical HFpEF models mainly focus on simulating organs and integrating physiological changes, such as pressure overload, ventricular wall thickening (hypertrophy), fibrosis, ejection fraction greater than 50%, and diastolic dysfunction. However, it remains debatable whether these macroscopic - level criteria are sufficient to support in - depth research on specific molecular or cellular behaviors. To improve the translatability of these models, the author suggests: 1. **Benchmarking**: Models should be matched with human HFpEF at the relevant basic level, not just at the integrated physiological level. For example, if a basic science study focuses on a specific molecule or cellular pathway/characteristic, models known to be similar to this pathway/characteristic in humans should be selected. 2. **Data sources**: Ensure that the human data used for comparison come from appropriate sources that can truly reflect the HFpEF population, such as patients prospectively diagnosed based on consensus criteria. 3. **Cautious presentation of results**: Avoid implying that findings in the model directly represent the situation in human HFpEF, but clearly state that these findings were obtained in a specific animal model. 4. **Inclusion of more molecular and cellular data**: As more and more molecular and cellular data on human HFpEF are reported, it will become easier to incorporate this information into the benchmarking of pre - clinical models, ultimately improving the ability to translate model findings to human diseases. Through the above measures, the author hopes to improve the existing pre - clinical HFpEF models, making them closer to the real pathological conditions, thereby providing a better basis for understanding and treating this disease.