Pathologic Quiz Case: Right Thigh Pain for 14 Months.
Yimin Ge,Zoran Gatalica,Shu-Yuan Xiao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5858/2003-127-e171-pqcrtp
2003-01-01
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
Abstract:An 8-year-old boy presented to his primary care physician with an 8-month history of intermittent right thigh pain. A hip x-ray film was read as normal, but the erythrocyte sedimentation rate was reported to be slightly elevated. He was diagnosed with “growth pain,” and no intervention was recommended. Six months later, he was again seen by his physician with pain that worsened significantly during the 2 weeks prior to the most recent admission, which caused the boy to limp. Laboratory tests showed a white blood cell count of 12 800/μL (12.8 × 109/L), the normal range for the age being 4000 to 10 000/μL (4–10 × 109/L), with 69.5% granulocytes, 18.8% lymphocytes, 10.9% monocytes, and 0.3% eosinophils; an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 46 mm/h (46 mm/h), the normal range being 0 to 10 mm/h (0–10 mm/h); a calcium measurement of 9.8 mg/dL (2.4 mmol/L), the normal range being 8.6 to 10.6 mg/dL (2.2–2.6 mmol/L); a phosphorus measurement of 4.5 mg/dL (1.5 mmol/L), the normal range being 3.1 to 6.0 mg/dL (1.0–1.9 mmol/L); an alkaline phosphatase measurement of 216 U/L (216 U/L), the normal range being 70 to 370 U/L (70–370 U/L); and a lactate dehydrogenase measurement of 896 U/L (896 U/L), the normal range being 300 to 600 U/L (300–600 U/L). Radiology studies, including x-ray films (Figure, A), computed tomography (Figure, B), magnetic resonance imaging, and bone scan, demonstrated multiple lytic lesions in the right femur, and a working diagnosis of “chronic osteomyelitis” was made. An open biopsy of the proximal right femur was performed, and puslike necrotic material was observed flowing from the periosteal area. The bone lesion was sampled for microscopic examination, and the necrotic material was collected for aerobic and anaerobic bacterial cultures. Microscopic examination revealed the changes shown in the Figure (C).What is your diagnosis?Periodic acid–Schiff stain showed cytoplasmic deposition of glycogen (Figure, D). Immunostaining demonstrated that tumor cells strongly expressed MIC-2 (CD99) (Figure, E) but were negative for cytokeratin (AE1/3), vimentin, and synaptophysin (data not shown).Ewing sarcoma accounts for 6% to 14.2% of malignant tumors of the bone and is the second most common sarcoma in children (the first is osteosarcoma).12 Ewing sarcoma is most often seen in young patients between 10 and 15 years. Clinically, patients with Ewing sarcoma often have nonspecific presentations including fever, anemia, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, pain and “warmth” in the affected site, and occasionally leukocytosis. The most common initial symptom is reported to be intermittent pain.3 These uncharacteristic manifestations often lead to an erroneous diagnosis of osteomyelitis,4 and routine laboratory evaluation may not distinguish between these entities. Radiologic features of Ewing sarcoma include destructive lytic and sclerotic bone lesions with permeative margins, early soft tissue involvement, and characteristic periosteal layers of reactive bone deposition in an onion-skin or a “sunburst” fashion. Factors that may have contributed to the difficulty in original clinical diagnosis of this case are the prolonged clinical course, uncharacteristic clinical presentations, and atypical radiologic findings of circumferential deposition of periosteal bone and little soft tissue involvement.Histologically, the tumor had both nuclear and cytoplasmic features of typical Ewing sarcoma, including uniform small round cells with indistinct cell borders, central round nuclei, fine granular chromatin, and absence of mitotic figures. A significant proportion of neoplastic cells exhibited extensive cytoplasmic vacuolization. This phenomenon is presumably due to cytoplasmic glycogen deposition seen in Ewing sarcoma and was further supported by a positive diastase-periodic acid–Schiff stain. The tumor diffusely extended through cancellous and cortical bone, where it was accompanied by focal marrow fibrosis and extreme bone remodeling. Single-cell necrosis (apoptosis) was also seen throughout the tumor. Several tumors exhibiting clear cell features, such as clear cell chondrosarcoma, metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma, and clear cell sarcoma (malignant melanoma of soft tissue), could be the differential diagnosis. However, the patient's age, the location(s) of the tumor, and special stains, including periodic acid–Schiff, MIC-2 (CD99), cytokeratin, vimentin, S100, HMB-45, and tryptase, usually are helpful in establishing the correct diagnosis.Biologically, Ewing sarcoma is an undifferentiated small cell tumor of bone and soft tissue and is closely related to other members of the Ewing sarcoma family of tumors. The genetic hallmark of the Ewing sarcoma family of tumors is the presence of the chromosomal translocation t(11;22)(q24;q12), which results in the EWS/FLI1 fusion gene and expression of the chimeric protein.5 Cytogenetic study or detection of the EWS/FLI-1 fusion transcript by in situ reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction6 may be helpful in the diagnosis of Ewing sarcoma. The Ewing sarcoma family of tumors also shares a common neural histogenesis and expresses neural markers, including neuron-specific enolase, neuroblastoma cell surface antigen, neurofilament 200 kd, Leu-7, and S100. The most commonly used marker in the diagnosis of Ewing sarcoma family of tumors is MIC-2 (CD99), a transmembrane molecule that is highly expressed on Ewing tumor cells.7 Although considered a characteristic maker for Ewing sarcoma, the diagnostic significance of a positive MIC-2 immunostain should be interpreted with caution because of its expression on 25% of neuroendocrine tumor cells8 and on hematopoietic cells.9