Pollution and Risk Assessment of Typical Heavy Metals in River Sediments of Seven Major Watersheds in China
Jinxi YANG,Yanfeng ZHANG,Lingyan ZHU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2017.01.61
2017-01-01
Abstract:In order to evaluate the ecological risks of heavy metals in freshwater sediments,according to the data reported in the literatures over the past 16 years (2000 to 2015),the concentrations and distributions of five typical heavy metals (i.e.,Cd,C u,Ni,Pb and Zn)in the sediments of seven major watersheds in China,including Yangtze River,Yellow River,Liaohe River,Songhua River,Haihe River,Huaihe River and Pearl River,were systematically analyzed.The sediment quality guidelines,including the threshold effect levels (TEL) and probable effect levels (PEL),for the five heavy metals were updated based on the biological effect database.TELs and PELs of Cu,Cd,Pb,Zn and Ni were 56.2,2.58,47.3,79.9,35.4 mg/kg and 141,19.6,200,461,78.6 mg/kg respectively.The concentrations of Cu,Cd,Pb,Zn and Ni in the sediments of the Pearl River were the highest among the seven rivers,followed by the Haihe and Yellow Rivers.The concentrations of heavy metals in the Yangtze River,Liaohe River,Songhua River and Huaihe River were relatively low.Comparing the heavy metal concentrations with the corresponding sediment quality guidelines,the ecological risks of the five heavy metals in the river sediments were evaluated,and the results were basically identical with the domestic and foreign research.The results indicated that the ecological risks of heavy metals in most of the river sediments were relatively low or not clear.Among all of the investigated river sediments,1.15%-7.60% displayed relatively high risk of heavy metals.The sediments of the Pearl River displayed the highest ecological risks,given that the concentrations of the five heavy metals were the highest and 4.41%-26.8% of the sampling sites exceeded the PELs,which was followed by Haihe River.The concentrations of Cu,Zn and Ni in the sediments of Haihe River were relatively high,and 14.1%,15.2% and 14.8% of the sampling sites exceeded their corresponding PELs.