Abstract:Purpose: Monitoring tumor response during the course of treatment and adaptively modifying treatment plan based on tumor biological feedback may represent a new paradigm for radiotherapy. Diffusion MRI has shown great promises in assessing and predicting tumor response to radiotherapy. However, the conventional diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar-imaging (DW-ssEPI) technique suffers from limited resolution, severe distortion, and possibly inaccurate ADC at low field strength. The purpose of this work was to develop a reliable, accurate and distortion-free diffusion MRI technique that is practicable for longitudinal tumor response evaluation and adaptive radiotherapy on a 0.35 T MRI-guided radiotherapy system. Methods: A diffusion-prepared turbo spin echo readout (DP-TSE) sequence was developed and compared with the conventional diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar-imaging sequence on a 0.35 T MRI-guided radiotherapy system (ViewRay). A spatial integrity phantom was used to quantitate and compare the geometric accuracy of the two diffusion sequences for three orthogonal orientations. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) accuracy was evaluated on a diffusion phantom under both 0 degrees C and room temperature to cover a diffusivity range between 0.40 x 10(-3) and 2.10 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. Ten room temperature measurements repeated on five different days were conducted to assess the ADC reproducibility of DP-TSE. Two glioblastoma (GBM) and six sarcoma patients were included to examine the in vivo feasibility. The target registration error (TRE) was calculated to quantitate the geometric accuracy where structural CT or MR images were co-registered to the diffusion images as references. ADC maps from DP-TSE and DW-ssEPI were calculated and compared. A tube phantom was placed next to patients not treated on ViewRay, and ADCs of this reference tube were also compared. Results: The proposed DP-TSE passed the spatial integrity test (< 1 mm within 100 mm radius and < 2 mm within 175 mm radius) under the three orthogonal orientations. The detected errors were 0.474 0.355 mm, 0.475 +/- 0.287 mm, and 0.546 +/- 0.336 mm in the axial, coronal, and sagittal plane. DW-ssEPI, however, failed the tests due to severe distortion and low signal intensity. Noise correction must be performed for the DW-ssEPI to avoid ADC quantitation errors, whereas it is optional for DP-TSE. At 0 degrees C, the two sequences provided accurate quantitation with < 3% variation with the reference. In the room temperature study, discrepancies between ADCs from DP-TSE and the reference were within 4%, but could be as high as 8% for DW-ssEPI after the noise correction. Excellent ADC reproducibility with a coefficient of variation < 5% was observed among the 10 measurements of DP-TSE, indicating desirable robustness for ADC-based tumor response assessment. In vivo TRE in DP-TSE was less than 1.6 mm overall, whereas it could be greater than 12 mm in DW-ssEPI. For GBM patients, the CSF and brain tissue ADCs from DP-TSE were within the ranges found in literature. ADC differences between the two techniques were within 8% among the six sarcoma patients. For the reference tube that had a relatively low diffusivity, the two diffusion sequences provided matched measurements. Conclusion: A diffusion technique with excellent geometric fidelity, accurate, and reproducible ADC measurement was demonstrated for longitudinal tumor response assessment using a low-field MRI-guided radiotherapy system. (C) 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine

Investigation of the effects of Gamma Knife radiosurgery on optic pathways using diffusion tensor MRI within the first year after treatment

Whole Brain Atlas-Based Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Parameters for the Evaluation of Multiple Cognitive-Related Brain Microstructure Injuries after Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastasis

Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for the Treatment of Cavernous Sinus Hemangiomas

Cavernous sinus cavernous hemangioma: imaging features and therapeutic effect of Gamma Knife radiosurgery

Rbio-01. Characterizing The Temporal Evolution Of Brain Architecture During Radiotherapy For Glioblastoma Using Nonlinear Image Registration

Importance of Pre-treatment Fractional Anisotropy Value in Predicting Volumetric Response in Patients with Meningioma Treated with Gamma Knife Radiosurgery

The clinical report of stereotactic radiosurgery for post-operational low-grade glial tumors

Distortion-Free Diffusion MRI using an MRI-Guided Tri-Cobalt 60 Radiotherapy System: Sequence Verification and Preliminary Clinical Experience.

Gamma Knife radiosurgery – 12 years of experience in a high-complexity center of a middle-income country

A Novel Perspective to Gamma-Knife Radiosurgery for Solitary Meningiomas: Adaptability of Fast Imaging Employing Steady-State Acquisition/Constructive Interference in Steady-State Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Preliminary research of fractionated radiotherapy with cyberknife for sellar and parasellar tumors

Promising outcome of patients with recurrent glioblastoma after Gamma Knife-based hypofractionated radiotherapy

Efficacy of hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery in treating surgical beds of metastatic brain tumors

A Preliminary Study on a Multi-Resolution-level Inverse Planning Approach for Gamma Knife Radiosurgery.

A preliminary study on a multi-resolution-level inverse planning algorithm for Gamma Knife radiosurgery

A Prospective Study on Perfusion MRI Changes in Intracranial Meningiomas Following Gamma Knife Therapy

Hypo-fractionated Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Intra-cranial Pathologies: A Single-Center Prospective Analysis of Feasibility, Safety, Efficacy, and Complication Profile

Imaging Markers Associated With Radiation-Induced Changes in Brain Arteriovenous Malformations After Radiosurgery

Post-operative gamma knife radiosurgery for WHO grade I intracranial meningiomas: A single-center, retrospective study

Volume-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery for orbital venous malformations.

Investigation of Gamma Knife Treatment Effect on Epileptic Foci in Patients with Intractable Epilepsy Localized by PET/CT