Abstract:Problem: Development of a novel, competency-based program of assessment requires creation of a plan to measure the processes that enable successful implementation. The principles of implementation science outline the importance of considering key drivers that support and sustain transformative change within an educational program. The introduction of Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) as a framework for assessment has underscored the need to create a structured plan to prepare assessors to engage in a new paradigm of assessment. Although approaches to rater training for workplace-based assessments have been described, specific strategies to prepare assessors to apply standards related to the level of supervision a student needs have not been documented. Intervention: We describe our systematic approach to prepare assessors, faculty and postgraduate trainees, to complete EPA assessments for medical students during the clerkship phase of our curriculum. This institution-wide program is designed to build assessors' skills in direct observation of learners during authentic patient encounters. Assessors apply new knowledge and practice skills in using established performance expectations to determine the level of supervision a learner needs to perform clinical tasks. Assessors also learn to provide feedback and narrative comments to coach students and promote their ongoing clinical development. Data visualizations for assessors facilitate reinforcement of the tenets learned during training. Collaborative learning and peer feedback during faculty development sessions promote the formation of a community of practice among assessors. Context: Faculty development for assessors was implemented in advance of implementation of the EPA program. Assessors in the program include residents/fellows who work closely with students, faculty with discipline-specific expertise and a group of experienced clinicians who were selected to serve as experts in competency-based EPA assessments, the Master Assessors. Training focused on creating a shared understanding about the application of criteria used to evaluate student performance. EPA assessments based on the AAMC's Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency, were completed in nine core clerkships. EPA assessments included a supervision rating based on a modified scale for use in undergraduate medical education. Impact: Data from EPA assessments completed during the first year of the program were analyzed to evaluate the effectiveness of the faculty development activities implemented to prepare assessors to consistently apply standards for assessment. A systematic approach to training and attention to critical drivers that enabled institution-wide implementation, led to consistency in the supervision rating for students' first EPA assessment completed by any type of assessor, ratings by assessors done within a specific clinical context, and ratings assigned by a group of specific assessors across clinical settings. Lessons learned: A systematic approach to faculty development with a willingness to be flexible and reach potential participants using existing infrastructure, can facilitate assessors' engagement in a new culture of assessment. Interaction among participants during training sessions not only promotes learning but also contributes to community building. A leadership group responsible to oversee faculty development can ensure that the needs of stakeholders are addressed and that a change in assessment culture is sustained.

Assessing the Assessment: Evidence of Reliability and Validity in the edTPA

Validity Evidence for Assessing Entrustable Professional Activities During Undergraduate Medical Education

New Teachers’ Perceptions on Being Prepared to Teach Students With Learning Disabilities: Insights From California

Developing Assessments of Content Knowledge for Teaching Using Evidence-centered Design

Formative performance assessment in preservice teacher education – working through the black boxes

The State Kindergarten Entry Assessment Digital Technology Landscape

Developing an entrustable professional activity for providing health education and consultation in occupational therapy and examining its validity

A Pilot Study of the Creation and Implementation of a Teaching Development Assessment Tool

Proceed with Caution: Interactive Rules and Teacher Work Sample Scoring Strategies, an Ethnomethodological Study

Constructing Approaches to Entrustable Professional Activity Development that Deliver Valid Descriptions of Professional Practice

Implementing Systematic Faculty Development to Support an EPA-Based Program of Assessment: Strategies, Outcomes, and Lessons Learned

"A whole other competence story": exploring faculty perspectives on the process of workplace-based assessment of entrustable professional activities

Evaluating Special Education Instructional Practices Using Observation Rubrics: Investigating the Reliability of School Administrator Ratings

EQual, a Novel Rubric to Evaluate Entrustable Professional Activities for Quality and Structure

The Interpretation and Use of Proficiency Test Scores in University Selection: How Valid and Ethical Are They?

The stability of kindergarten teachers’ effectiveness: A generalizability study comparing the Framework For Teaching and the Classroom Assessment Scoring System

Stakes Matter: Student Motivation and the Validity of Student Assessments for Teacher Evaluation

Use of Evidence-Centered Design to Develop Learning Maps-Based Assessments

Education Research: Quality and Validity Evidence for a National In-Training Examination for Epilepsy Fellows

A scoping review on the psychometric properties of the teacher efficacy for inclusive practices (TEIP) scale

Grading Teacher Performance Appraisal Systems: Understanding the Implications of Student Test Scores and Performance Information Use