Machine-Learning Applications for the Retrieval of Forest Biomass from Airborne P-Band SAR Data
Emanuele Santi,Simonetta Paloscia,Simone Pettinato,Giovanni Cuozzo,Antonio Padovano,Claudia Notarnicola,Clement Albinet
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12050804
IF: 5
2020-03-02
Remote Sensing
Abstract:This study aimed at evaluating the potential of machine learning (ML) for estimating forest biomass from polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data. Retrieval algorithms based on two different machine-learning methods, namely Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and Supported Vector Regressions (SVRs), were implemented and validated using the airborne polarimetric SAR data derived from the AfriSAR, BioSAR, and TropiSAR campaigns. These datasets, composed of polarimetric airborne SAR data at P-band and corresponding biomass values from in situ and LiDAR measurements, were made available by the European Space Agency (ESA) in the framework of the Biomass Retrieval Algorithm Inter-Comparison Exercise (BRIX). The sensitivity of the SAR measurements at all polarizations to the target biomass was evaluated on the entire set of data from all the campaigns, and separately on the dataset of each campaign. Based on the results of the sensitivity analysis, the retrieval was attempted by implementing general algorithms, using the entire dataset, and specific algorithms, using data of each campaign. Algorithm inputs are the SAR data and the corresponding local incidence angles, and output is the estimated biomass. To allow the comparison, both ANN and SVR were trained using the same subset of data, composed of 50% of the available dataset, and validated on the remaining part of the dataset. The validation of the algorithms demonstrated that both machine-learning methods were able to estimate the forest biomass with comparable accuracies. In detail, the validation of the general ANN algorithm resulted in a correlation coefficient R = 0.88, RMSE = 60 t/ha, and negligible BIAS, while the specific ANN for data obtained R from 0.78 to 0.94 and RMSE between 15 and 50 t/ha, depending on the dataset. Similarly, the general SVR was able to estimate the target parameter with R = 0.84, RMSE = 69 t/ha, and BIAS negligible, while the specific algorithms obtained 0.22 ≤ R ≤ 0.92 and 19 ≤ RMSE ≤ 70 (t/ha). The study also pointed out that the computational cost is similar for both methods. In this respect, the training is the only time-demanding part, while applying the trained algorithm to the validation set or to any other dataset occurs in near real time. As a final step of the study, the ANN and SVR algorithms were applied to the available SAR images for obtaining biomass maps from the available SAR images.
environmental sciences,imaging science & photographic technology,remote sensing,geosciences, multidisciplinary